radix 62 and 95 not supported ? about format-preserving-encryption

[0NG]

It supports.

I have run the code with your test data. Then, I found decrypt(encrypt(plaintext)) == plaintext, so I think there's nothing wrong with the decryption and encryption procedures.

The error comes from my example code. You can look at this line to find my implementation of the (inverse) mapping between numeral string and character string. These implementations only support radix up to 36. Thus, if you need larger radix, you can implement the mappings by yourself.

Hmmm...There is actually something strange... Are you sure that the ciphertext is xs8a0azh2avyalyzuwd? I found the numeral string of the ciphertext is 79 57 54 15 10 8 6 87 3 9 65 1 69 83 1 73 53 46 80 (FF1) and 72 60 77 39 93 64 0 47 34 54 75 0 25 94 49 62 11 75 89 (FF3).

[shaakaud]

Thank you. I was able to figure out the mapping and inverse mapping part of your code. I was able to modify those and get it working. Thanks for your response.

The ciphertext that i pasted above is wrong. (that ciphertex is for radix 36). I am closing this issue.

Thanks again for your prompt response.