This is a question about Ruby version

#10 · open · 1 comments

View on GitHub ↗

ricir

Can minimaJake be used with Ruby 3.2? The reason is that I would like to use the plugin jekyll-og-image which requires Ruby 3.2.

Comments

JakeSteam

Not sure, sorry! It has the same compatibility as the original minima, so perhaps check if that is compatible. On Mon, 14 Apr 2025, 18:34 Riccardo, ***@***.***> wrote: > Can minimaJake be used with Ruby 3.2? > > The reason is that I would like to use the plugin jekyll-og-image which > requires Ruby 3.2. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/JakeSteam/minimaJake/issues/10>, or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC6OVTHWT6QFUEQ75FEYFML2ZPWTBAVCNFSM6AAAAAB3DRQ7ECVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSHE4TGNZRG4ZTQMI> > . > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message > ID: ***@***.***> > *ricir* created an issue (JakeSteam/minimaJake#10) > <https://github.com/JakeSteam/minimaJake/issues/10> > > Can minimaJake be used with Ruby 3.2? > > The reason is that I would like to use the plugin jekyll-og-image which > requires Ruby 3.2. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/JakeSteam/minimaJake/issues/10>, or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC6OVTHWT6QFUEQ75FEYFML2ZPWTBAVCNFSM6AAAAAB3DRQ7ECVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSHE4TGNZRG4ZTQMI> > . > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message > ID: ***@***.***> >