What extra advantage of using bloomer instead of plain bulma css classes about bloomer

[lokesh1729]

@AlgusDark : I used bloomer in one of my projects, the problem is that, i need to refer both bulma and bloomer documentation to write code, also when using bloomer, it's hard to figure out whether a particular component is block level or inline or inline-block HTML element.

[AlgusDark]

I see... yes, I need to rewrite this but since I moved to Japan, surprisingly I haven't found any free time.

I believe that there is no easy way to figure out the display of a react component in any UI library.

Anyhow, if you find some ideas, I would appreciate. Maybe it's better to have a V2 with Bulma inside and have a webpack loader to remove some CSS that isn't needed (with the help of purgecss?)

[AlgusDark]

Hi,
bloomer are just react bindings... it doesn't export bulma, you need to do that.

So, the only advantage of using plain css clases is that you have react bindings so you don't need to write them.

At first, I wanted to create the thing you mention on export only some parts, but wanted to do it with styled-components or other CSS-in-js... problem is that is an entire rewrite and will be hard to maintain.

But, for what you want, you can use something like purgecss.

[lokesh1729]

Hi,

thanks for quick revert, i really appreciate. rewriting with css-in-js is very hard... i got answer to my question. hence closing the issue :)