Small documentation bugs about llama

[bernhardmgruber]

Wow, that's great! Thank you very much for finding these! I will update the docs accordingly soon!

[bernhardmgruber]

I am not sure I fully understood the 3. point. I replaced this comment:

// Let assume a1 and a2 using A and b using B.

by the following declarations:

    llama::One<A> a1, a2;
    llama::One<B> b;

That should make it more clear what the variables are. Does this address your comment?

[SimeonEhrig]

Yes, that's address my issue. I didn't really recognize the comment. In the end, I understand the example in general. It was only inconsistent compare to the other code examples.

[bernhardmgruber]

Perfect, thank you again for finding these!

[SimeonEhrig]

Sorry for being late with the review, but I see, that you forgot some question marks in the introduction.rst. If you open the raw view on GitHub, you can find it easily: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bernhardmgruber/llama/4eb58447b1a1a13b23e51cb6228cab70f161e932/docs/pages/introduction.rst

[bernhardmgruber]

I really wonder how these happen. I cannot even type this type of apostrophe. I will have a look!

[SimeonEhrig]

I was also surprised as I saw the diff of the commit.