TypeError thrown when serializing UUIDField about drf_ujson2

[Amertz08]

I think the closest thing to a fix at the renderer level would be something like follows.

class UJSONRenderer:

    translate_func = lambda v: v

    def render(self, ...):
        # ...
        ret = ujson.dumps(self.translate_func(data), ...)

Where you can write a function that translates your response into a ujson serializable object. There would be performance implications obviously that should be explored.

[Amertz08]

I might implement this in an alpha release and see how it goes.

[Amertz08]

I've ran into this issue myself. I'd consider explicitly declaring a serialize on ProdSerializer to handle the uuid.

uuid = serializers.CharField()

[shydefoo]

Hmm, this seems to be a temp fix. It would be great if the UUID Fields could be rendered just like how JSONRenderer handles them.

[Amertz08]

Yeah so it looks like the built in json module supports passing an encoder class which is what the base JSONRenderer class takes advantage of in order to handle UUIDs. It looks like ujson is adding support for it [1]. So I don't think I can do anything particularly clean until then. I did post a ticket to the repo to suggest supporting UUIDs directly but it doesn't look like that will be implemented [2].

[1] ultrajson/ultrajson#124
[2] ultrajson/ultrajson#385

[aaronn]

Would love to see this– I'm using UUIDs for all of my PKs. Doesn't sound like ujson is ever going to prioritize either custom encoders or support uuid serialization directly.

[Amertz08]

@aaronn The last time I looked (haven't in a while) at ujson they were going to add support for custom encoders. So my thought was wait to see what that interface looks like. I'll have to look into what their timeline is now. Last I checked they basically said if json out of the box doesn't support it then they won't either so encoding UUID objects directly is a no go. The custom encoders were thus their path forward (to my understanding).

[aaronn]

Just checked the issue and they've removed it from the milestone. It doesn't look like something they have any plans to prioritize.

[Amertz08]

Alright I'll put something out on this. I have had time for this I just haven't made time.

[Amertz08]

For this to work you'll have to implement a recursive function that will traverse the various structures and types. I think the recursion will really matter around dict/list. This was the reason I was so apprehensive about implementing it. That being said should be available via pip install drf_ujson2==1.7.0a1

[Amertz08]

I actually think I have the typing wrong on data: Union[dict, None], in the def render call. That might need to be Any or Union[Dict, List, None] not sure what makes sense.

[Amertz08]

Something like this.

def translate(data: Any):
    if isinstance(data, list):
        return [translate(d) for d in data]
    if isinstance(data, dict):
        return {key: translate(value) for key, value in data.items()}
    if isinstance(data, uuid.UUID):
        return str(data)
    return data

could be wrong though 🤷