Adding credentials to the HttpLink and/or ApolloFetch API about apollo-link

[shendepu]

@jbaxleyiii Since credentials is configurable on apollo-link-http, but it is not available on apollo-link-batch-http.

[goldo]

any news on credentials being available for apollo-link-batch-http ?

[moimael]

Would be great to have it on apollo-link-batch-http, we had to disable batching in production and are seeing a huge increase in dyno usage.

[jbaxleyiii]

I think we should allow credentials and headers to the constructor for the http-link https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-link/tree/master/packages/apollo-link-http#options.

I'll assign and do this!

[tgriesser]

Yep, I'll get something over in a bit

[jbaxleyiii]

Supported via #144!

[stubailo]

Hmm, this is definitely one thing that was easier in the previous network interface implementation. I think it should probably be possible to do everything with just HttpLink IMO, but curious what @jbaxleyiii thinks.

[stubailo]

Also, @jaydenseric what do you think?

[stubailo]

Just asked James, we like the first example:

new HttpLink({
  uri: 'https://www.example.com/graphql', 
  credentials: 'include', 
  headers: {
    'X-Example-Header': config.VERSION
  }
})

I think that would include modifications to apollo fetch as well, right?

[tgriesser]

Cool

I think that would include modifications to apollo fetch as well, right?

Correct, they'd pass through from HttpLink/BatchHttpLink to apollo fetch and presumably be merged into the options object here.

[stubailo]

@tgriesser that would be awesome - do you have time to work on a PR for that?

[stubailo]

Thanks!

[jaydenseric]

Also, @jaydenseric what do you think?

I don't fully appreciate the consequences of this proposal as the way all these new packages link together still hasn't clicked for me yet, even though I'm productively using them.

Unless I'm confused, is it a good idea this high up in the API to bake in support for fetch API options such as credentials: 'include' when a custom fetch function might use something other than fetch internally, such as XHR?

As an side note, auth header examples are pretty different looking between apollo-link and apollo-fetch:

• https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-link/blob/master/docs/summary.md#authentication
• https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-fetch#middleware

Is apollo-link really intended to be used directly when building apps anyway?

this is definitely one thing that was easier in the previous network interface implementation.

IMO it has been as easy, or easier (WIP documentation aside) than before to set everything up. A real-world batched client setup with auth headers and uploads for a SSR Next.js app (see example without auth here for context):

import { ApolloClient } from 'react-apollo'
import BatchHttpLink from 'apollo-link-batch-http'
import { createApolloFetchUpload } from 'apollo-fetch-upload'

function createApolloClient({ initialState, getViewerToken }) {
  const apolloUploadFetch = createApolloFetchUpload({
    uri: `${process.env.API_URI}/graphql`
  })

  apolloUploadFetch.batchUse(({ options }, next) => {
    const viewerToken = getViewerToken()
    if (viewerToken) {
      if (!options.headers) options.headers = {}
      options.headers.authorization = `Bearer ${viewerToken}`
    }
    next()
  })

  return new ApolloClient({
    ssrMode: !process.browser,
    initialState,
    networkInterface: new BatchHttpLink({ fetch: apolloUploadFetch })
  })
}

For auth related fetch headers I used to have them fixed for SSR and as middleware for the client, in case the viewer situation changes between operations in a group of batched requests. For simplicity I just use middleware for both now since it doesn't seem to really slow SSR.

[stubailo]

Is apollo-link really intended to be used directly when building apps anyway?

I'd claim that the code sample above qualifies as "using it directly", since you still have to deal with the configuration API.

I think you've got a good point about custom fetch functions that might have different APIs than window.fetch.

Would it be fair to say that the idea of building this into apollo-fetch is less controversial? What's our confidence level that having a credentials: include option on apollo-fetch would be a good idea?

[AdamYee]

I might not fully understand the challenge here, but perhaps credentials could be used at the Link level or the fetch level where fetch defined credentials override Link defined credentials. It seems like the design approach has been to provide helpful defaults in a Link in addition to providing convenient ways to set fetch behavior.

Until this lands on an established pattern, I'll be taking this approach which seems independent of any changes made Link-wise.

const fetch = createApolloFetchUpload({
  uri: '/graphql'
});
fetch.batchUse(({ options }, next) => {
  options.credentials = 'same-origin';
  next();
});

I also noticed the docs have been getting updated recently. Does anyone know the current API design direction for this issue?

[rtymchyk]

@moimael until there's an API on apollo-link-batch-http the workaround is using the solution described here: #44 (comment)

[KROT47]

@tgriesser, @stubailo, any news on solving this?

[stubailo]

Can you open a new issue specifically for the batch link?

[KROT47]

@stubailo done. See #343