Not Using Second GPU about tensorflow_macos

[BatmanDZ]

The same thing. I've tried to run code on Mac Pro with 2 AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo (4 GPU). Using MNIST and CIFAR datasets it uses only one GPU and only 30-50%.

[dmmajithia]

@BatmanDZ can you try increasing the batch size? That increases GPU utilization for me.

[BatmanDZ]

Yes, increased up to maximum. It did not help, GPU usage did not increased and it used only one GPU. Отправлено с iPhone

…

7 дек. 2020 г., в 19:04, Dhawal Majithia ***@***.***> написал(а):  @BatmanDZ can you try increasing the batch size? That increases GPU utilization for me. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[dmmajithia]

Can you post your model definition?
Is it similar to the CNN posted in #25 ?

[BatmanDZ]

Yes, it’s exactly the same.

…

7 дек. 2020 г., в 22:11, Dhawal Majithia ***@***.***> написал(а): Can you post your model definition? Is it similar to the CNN posted in #25 <#25> ? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#52 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQ4G4VGCBJ22YHFANQF23VLSTUSFDANCNFSM4UN7HZ7A>.

[BatmanDZ]

With mode 'GPU', the batch size 1000
-GPU usage - 16%,
-CPU usage - 839%.

[BatmanDZ]

Train on 60 steps, validate on 10 steps
Epoch 1/12
60/60 [==============================] - ETA: 0s - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.5020 - accuracy: 0.8679
/Users/dz/opt/anaconda3/envs/py38/lib/python3.8/site-packages/tensorflow/python/keras/engine/training.py:2325: UserWarning: Model.state_updates will be removed in a future version. This property should not be used in TensorFlow 2.0, as updates are applied automatically.
warnings.warn('Model.state_updates will be removed in a future version. '
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 375ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.5020 - accuracy: 0.8679 - val_loss: 0.1656 - val_accuracy: 0.9499
Epoch 2/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 382ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.1169 - accuracy: 0.9657 - val_loss: 0.0736 - val_accuracy: 0.9777
Epoch 3/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 390ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0658 - accuracy: 0.9808 - val_loss: 0.0519 - val_accuracy: 0.9838
Epoch 4/12
60/60 [==============================] - 26s 377ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0490 - accuracy: 0.9854 - val_loss: 0.0480 - val_accuracy: 0.9840
Epoch 5/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 384ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0393 - accuracy: 0.9884 - val_loss: 0.0414 - val_accuracy: 0.9865
Epoch 6/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 391ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0314 - accuracy: 0.9904 - val_loss: 0.0421 - val_accuracy: 0.9866
Epoch 7/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 386ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0273 - accuracy: 0.9920 - val_loss: 0.0413 - val_accuracy: 0.9870
Epoch 8/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 389ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0236 - accuracy: 0.9930 - val_loss: 0.0388 - val_accuracy: 0.9877
Epoch 9/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 386ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0190 - accuracy: 0.9944 - val_loss: 0.0354 - val_accuracy: 0.9887
Epoch 10/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 389ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0151 - accuracy: 0.9955 - val_loss: 0.0370 - val_accuracy: 0.9884
Epoch 11/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 388ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0126 - accuracy: 0.9966 - val_loss: 0.0343 - val_accuracy: 0.9889
Epoch 12/12
60/60 [==============================] - 27s 389ms/step - batch: 29.5000 - size: 1.0000 - loss: 0.0119 - accuracy: 0.9967 - val_loss: 0.0424 - val_accuracy: 0.9878
Out[3]:
<tensorflow.python.keras.callbacks.History at 0x7fe190e83fa0>

[BatmanDZ]

With the batch size 5000 it was worse - about 12% GPU usage and 36s per step

[dmmajithia]

It might be the case that the model is small enough to not gain from GPU usage.
Can you try adding 2x more convolutional layers?

[BatmanDZ]

Tried. Usage increased to 50% and time per epoch decreased to 24s

[anna-tikhonova]

@anagrath Thank you for reporting this issue. Could you please send us more information about your config? Also, are you setting device type to 'any'? What batch size are you using?

[anagrath]

Am new to Tensorflow. It has been 20 years since I last played with neural nets and so I am sure terminology has changed and so I went and got a book a few days back that I am now going through.

What I did was go here: https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/quickstart/beginner and turn that into a file. Then I imported the ml and set it to 'any'. I have played around with any/cpu/gpu settings.

After I filed the issue, because other people seem to be experiencing the issue and there was fast uptake, I assumed this will get resolved at some point. So, I began modifying the code to see if I could get start get information on my own problem working with it.... (marketing data that I downloaded from one of our providers). here is the sorely misguided code I am currently using:

import tensorflow as tf
import csv
import numpy as np
import random
import sys
from tensorflow.python.compiler.mlcompute import mlcompute

method = sys.argv[6]

mlcompute.set_mlc_device(device_name=method)

fname = sys.argv[1]
epochs = int(sys.argv[2])
linear = int(sys.argv[3])
swish = int(sys.argv[4])
relu = int(sys.argv[5])

OUTPUT_SIZE = 50
BUCKET_SIZE = 2

def splitTrainTest(data):
  random.shuffle(data)
  trainLen = int(len(data) * 0.7)
  return (data[:trainLen], data[trainLen:])
  
def splitInputOutput(data):
  inputs = []
  outputs = []
  for row in data:
    outval = round(row[-1] / BUCKET_SIZE)
    if outval < OUTPUT_SIZE:
      inputs.append(row[0:-1])
      outputs.append(outval)
  return (np.matrix(inputs), np.array(outputs))


data = []
first_row = True
header = []
with open(fname) as csvfile:
  reader = csv.reader(csvfile)
  for row in reader:
    if first_row:
      first_row = False
      header = row
    else:
      floatRow = [float(e) for e in row]
      data.append(floatRow)

(train, test) = splitTrainTest(data)
(x_train, y_train) = splitInputOutput(train)
(x_test,  y_test)  = splitInputOutput(test)

model = tf.keras.models.Sequential([ 
  tf.keras.layers.Dense(linear, activation='linear'),
  tf.keras.layers.Dense(swish, activation='swish'),
  tf.keras.layers.Dense(relu, activation='relu'),

  tf.keras.layers.Dense(OUTPUT_SIZE)
])



predictions = model(x_train[:1]).numpy()


loss_fn = tf.keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True)


loss_fn(y_train[:1], predictions).numpy()

model.compile(optimizer='adam',
              loss=loss_fn,
              metrics=['accuracy'])
              
model.fit(x_train, y_train, epochs=epochs)

print("Test Set:")
model.evaluate(x_test,  y_test, verbose=2)

As you can see I started to extract out to command line different settings including the cpu/gpu/any. I am also now running three layers. Since it was not using all the resources, I figured I could run the same experiment with different settings to see if one of the settings work better on my data, though even when I fill up GPU 1 it does not switch over to GPU 2 (same as what I saw if I ran the MNIST tutorial setup multiple times). It would be interesting if we could specify which gpu on that line so that one configuration could be run on one gpu while another could be run on the second.

In the end, I have very little clue on what I am supposed to be doing :) so I do not know if I am doing it right or if the above suggestion even makes sense. Maybe in another week when I kill the tensorflow book I will have a better idea... the early examples in the book I found use scikit and tensorflow examples are much later. It may take me a minute to catch up to you guys.

[anagrath]

I should also say that if you have an example that you need me to run, I am happy to try to run it to help get the issue resolved.

[anna-tikhonova]

@anagrath Thank you for posting the code. Could you tell me which command line arguments you are running this code with?

[anagrath]

have been running different numbers, sometimes simultaneously (different tabs). Was doing powers of 2. Started to get declining returns around 4096 on accuracy. Again, I am running multiple instances on different numbers to use up more resources get some answers faster. Here are some example runs:

300 512 1024 512 cpu
300 1024 2048 1024 any
300 2048 4096 2048 gpu