add support for declarative languages about m2cgen

[izeigerman]

Hey @StrikerRUS. Not sure I understand what you mean. Assemblers make no assumptions of this sort. The entire AST that comes out of assembler is a single expression which can be interpreted in a purely functional fashion. Except for perhaps Subroutines which can be safely ignored if needed.
Perhaps you can give a more specific example?

[StrikerRUS]

Hmmm, then seems that the base classes of code generator and interpreter confused me when suggested to override variable definition and if statement.

[izeigerman]

then seems that the base classes of code generator and interpreter confused me when suggested to override variable definition and if statement.

That's true. So far we only added support for imperative languages and we haven't had need/demand to add functional ones. This is why the current interpreter/codegen class hierarchy only reflects imperative style. The AST and assemblers, however, have no coupling of this sort.

[StrikerRUS]

Thank you very much for the detailed explanation!
Feel free to close the issue. Or you can leave it as a feature request 🙂 .