Allow password-less sudo for basebox user about bisdn-linux

[KanjiMonster]

Also, having basebox and basebox.default lying around in /etc/sudoers.d/ (presumably upgrade artifacts) is confusing; we should consider cleaning that up.

This happens (or should only happen) if you modified /etc/sudoers.d/basebox - the .default is the original file from the image, renamed to .default if the backed up version differs from it (if they are identical, it shouldn't be created).

It is kept so you can easily revert back to defaults, or know what values you changed.

[ideaship]

That is true for all the configuration files that we back up and restore. The file in /etc/sudoers.d, however, is a special case because AFAICT the *.default file is active, too. While other files are not processed with a different name (e.g., /etc/passwd.default), /etc/sudoers.d/basebox.default is.

[KanjiMonster]

That is true for all the configuration files that we back up and restore. The file in /etc/sudoers.d, however, is a special case because AFAICT the *.default file is active, too. While other files are not processed with a different name (e.g., /etc/passwd.default), /etc/sudoers.d/basebox.default is.

At least according to https://github.com/bisdn/meta-switch/blob/main/scripts/installer/lib/backup.sh#L167 the .default shouldn't be active.