Save a tagged commit of PR branch at meeting time about website

[jonatack]

Hmm. Is there a PR you have in mind that changed a lot afterward? I imagine we would want to still link to the live PR in bitcoin/bitcoin to encourage reviewing it. If we don't fork, for the obsolescence reasons you mention CONTRIBUTING.md could suggest to avoid using commit links/refs in the notes and questions, and when feasible to use the most recent release branch for links to the codebase (for instance, in yesterday's notes when describing the current behaviour the links were to 0.19).

[jonatack]

My intuition is that the living aspect of the actual repo is more compelling than a museum fork ;) nevertheless you raise good points worth considering.

[jnewbery]

One example: the meeting log here: https://bitcoincore.reviews/15996.html contains a link to bitcoin/bitcoin@0c39465 - a commit which no longer exists.

[jonatack]

Right, that link in the log should be updated. I agree that it would be good to use a fork for links. Would require an addition to the contributing notes.

[jnewbery]

Done in #108