vmware unclustered VM about netbox-ssot

[TaLoN1x]

So maybe I could fix this by just assigning the same site to vm as its host device (server)?

But then we cannot assign the host device to the VM. If we create a hypothetical Cluster with same name as host device, then we can assign both Site and Host device to it. :) I know it's a bit counter-logical...

[TaLoN1x]

The cluster got assigned DefaultSite, no Tenant and no hosts were added to it. Host and tenant can be worked around via mapping, but I think they should be inherited from the host device itself.

ERROR (vc-test): failed to sync vmware VM [TEST-HES-DB.energia.sise](some-vm-in-single-node.local: unexpected status code: 400: {"cluster":["The selected cluster (single-node-cluster.local) is not assigned to this site (DefaultSite)."]}

[bl4ko]

I have tried to create vm via webui, without assigning a host device to it (just passing its name). And I get a netbox limit of:

A virtual machine must be assigned to a site and/or cluster.

So I guess every vm need a site or cluster assigned to it. So if no cluster is assigned to it, site has to be assigned to it to be able to add it into the netbox.

[bl4ko]

So maybe I could fix this by just assigning the same site to vm as its host device (server)?

[TaLoN1x]

correct, currently ssot thus is trying to assign device, but it cannot be assigned without cluster as of netbox scheme.

[bl4ko]

Yeah, you are right. I think creating hypothetical cluster is the best solution here...

[bl4ko]

@TaLoN1x could you test this issue against 141-vmware-unclustered-vm branch?

[bl4ko]

I think this should fix it now.

[TaLoN1x]

works good now!

[bl4ko]

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.6.10 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀