Referene to a missing js file in the code about dynamictextgroup

[designermonkey]

Andrew, does this make the field unusable? I need this in a project.

[andrewminton]

Yes mate, The presentation is all to pot in the Section entry editor.

I've searched Brocks code on all branches and there is no reference to this file in the repo.

[designermonkey]

Damn. Rethinking time then. Cheers Andrew.

andrewminton wrote:

Yes mate, The presentation is all to pot in the Section entry editor.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#15 (comment).

[andrewminton]

It may be a refactoring of what JS file is loaded at first build of section with dynamictextgroup and see what is in use there..

I got a feeling there is no need for that bit of code, cos it worked when I first created the section and started adding Dynamic Text Entry Fields.

[designermonkey]

Ok, when I get to that section, I'll take a look at it.

andrewminton wrote:

It may be a refactoring of what JS file is loaded at first build of
section with dynamictextgroup and see what is in use there..

I got a feeling there is no need for that bit of code, cos it worked
when I first created the section and started adding Dynamic Text Entry
Fields.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#15 (comment).

[andrewminton]

Tidy..

I'm in there too as well.. local build with 2.3.2 to test it out.. I am using the Development Branch and that's where I'm experiencing this issue.. I think Master branch is fine as it has no reference to the custom select2.custom.js file in there.

[designermonkey]

master isn't compatible with 2.3.x sadly.

I've run into other issues with the JS in this as it's only able to run a single instance of the field, and I haven't got time to rejig it to work for multiple, so have dropped it from the spec.

[andrewminton]

Yeh, I think Multiple instances was on the TODO list for v3.

[andrewminton]

A good duplicator to trump SSM is in dire need of some investment me
thinks.. so much promise.. Rowans Content
Fieldhttps://github.com/rowan-lewis/content_fieldis quite useful at
the moment.

On 26 March 2013 23:25, John Porter [email protected] wrote:

master isn't compatible with 2.3.x sadly.

I've run into other issues with the JS in this as it's only able to run a
single instance of the field, and I haven't got time to rejig it to work
for multiple, so have dropped it from the spec.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/15#issuecomment-15495365
.

[brockpetrie]

I've removed the line that references the missing file, so this should be fixed now. Thanks Andrew

[andrewminton]

Ahh right, so it just wasn't needed then. Might file a small issue with styling looking all wonky when editing a section entry using develpoment branch.. will test first though.. cheers.