lint ignore not working about buf

[bufdev]

This isn't a bug - you have duplicate types.

https://github.com/xmlking/micro-starter-kit/blob/develop/srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto
https://github.com/xmlking/micro-starter-kit/blob/develop/e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto

Both contain the same types, for example micro.account.profile.v1.ProfileService. This would fail with protoc as well:

$ git remote -v
origin	https://github.com/xmlking/micro-starter-kit (fetch)
origin	https://github.com/xmlking/micro-starter-kit (push)
$ protoc -I . -o /dev/null $(find . -name *.proto)
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:24:31: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListRequest.limit" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:26:31: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListRequest.page" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:27:31: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListRequest.sort" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:28:31: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListRequest.preferred_theme" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:31:48: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListRequest.gender" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:23:9: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListRequest" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:37:46: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListResponse.results" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:38:10: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListResponse.total" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:35:9: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListResponse" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto: "micro.account.profile.v1.GetRequest.id" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:43:33: "micro.account.profile.v1.GetRequest.profile_id" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:45:33: "micro.account.profile.v1.GetRequest.user_id" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:41:9: "micro.account.profile.v1.GetRequest" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:52:37: "micro.account.profile.v1.GetResponse.result" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:50:9: "micro.account.profile.v1.GetResponse" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:56:31: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateRequest.user_id" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:58:31: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateRequest.tz" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:59:31: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateRequest.avatar" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:61:48: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateRequest.gender" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:63:29: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateRequest.birthday" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:65:31: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateRequest.preferred_theme" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:55:9: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateRequest" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:72:37: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateResponse.result" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:70:9: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateResponse" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:16:7: "micro.account.profile.v1.ProfileService.List" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:17:7: "micro.account.profile.v1.ProfileService.Get" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:18:7: "micro.account.profile.v1.ProfileService.Create" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:15:9: "micro.account.profile.v1.ProfileService" is already defined in file "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto".
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:16:12: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListRequest" seems to be defined in "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto", which is not imported by "srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto".  To use it here, please add the necessary import.
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:16:34: "micro.account.profile.v1.ListResponse" seems to be defined in "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto", which is not imported by "srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto".  To use it here, please add the necessary import.
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:17:11: "micro.account.profile.v1.GetRequest" seems to be defined in "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto", which is not imported by "srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto".  To use it here, please add the necessary import.
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:17:32: "micro.account.profile.v1.GetResponse" seems to be defined in "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto", which is not imported by "srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto".  To use it here, please add the necessary import.
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:18:14: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateRequest" seems to be defined in "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto", which is not imported by "srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto".  To use it here, please add the necessary import.
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:18:38: "micro.account.profile.v1.CreateResponse" seems to be defined in "e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto", which is not imported by "srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto".  To use it here, please add the necessary import.
srv/account/proto/profile/profile_service.proto:13:1: warning: Import third_party/proto/validate/validate.proto is unused.

[bufdev]

Not directly related to your issue, but also see https://buf.build/docs/build-configuration#root-requirements.

The general issue is you can't have a type defined in two places as part of your build - this is a general Protobuf requirement, not just a Buf requirement (and is also a requirement in most languages). There's some issue above where you have nearly the same file in two places.

Closing this issue unless there's something else. Let us know!

[xmlking]

@bufdev thanks for clarifying. I had e2e/profile_service.bloomrpc.proto for documentation purpose only.

bloomrpc tool cannot load .proto files with certain validation rules. so I have to share slightly modified profile_service.bloomrpc.proto in my repo.

I am building my protos with Makefile

		for f in ${TYPE}/${TARGET}/proto/**/*.proto; do \
			protoc --proto_path=.:${GOPATH}/src \
			--go_out=paths=source_relative:. \
			--micro_out=paths=source_relative:. \
			--gorm_out=engine=postgres,enums=string,paths=source_relative:. \
			--validate_out=lang=go,paths=source_relative:. $$f; \
			echo ✓ compiled: $$f; \
		done \

is it possible to make Buf truly ** exclude** some files from BUILD and LINT if I give . as root?
it is common to have some duplicate photo files in docs or dist folders

[bufdev]

Yes, see https://buf.build/docs/build-configuration#excludes