Comments (15)
Me too.
I using Windows 7 x64. some fonts didn't show bold texts in Internet
Explorer(or all
of program). Character Spacing is increased but not bold texts.
Here, I attach screenshots.
gdipp_bold_1.png, increased Character Spacing but we can't look bold texts.
gdipp_bold_2.png is not rendered screenshot. We can look bold texts.
gdipp_bold_3.png is rendered by gdipp. Where are bold texts?
Legacy CJK from Windows default truetype fonts didn't make bold font.
MS Gothic, MS PGothic, MS UI Gothic
MS Mincho, MS PMincho
Gulim, Gulimche
Dotum, Dotumche
Batang, Batangche
Gungsuh, Gungsuhche
MingLiu, PMingLiu
SimSun, NSimSun
SimHei
KaiTi
and so on.
Original comment by [email protected]
on 1 Apr 2010 at 2:43
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
Attachments:
from gdipp.
This problem occurs only if there is no separate Bold style file for the font
family.
Original comment by [email protected]
on 7 Apr 2010 at 5:29
- Changed state: Accepted
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
Ah, I see.
Is this something that I can fix myself (by adjusting the font file), or do you
intend
to add support for such fonts in future releases?
Many thanks,
James
x
Original comment by [email protected]
on 7 Apr 2010 at 5:39
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
I have identified the problem. I will fix it in the next release.
Original comment by [email protected]
on 7 Apr 2010 at 10:20
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
Great stuff - many thank!
James
x
Original comment by [email protected]
on 7 Apr 2010 at 12:37
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
I wonder if the fix made it too bold? It was quite unreadable on 0.7.4 beta so
I
reverted to 0.7.3
Original comment by [email protected]
on 11 Apr 2010 at 11:50
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
[deleted comment]
from gdipp.
Well, the UI elements that were not bold previous are now rendered as bold - I
have
made some comparisons with gdi++ the bold weight appears to match.
However, for some reason the normal (non-bold) style is now rendered very
faintly,
yet only in some programmes. The UI in Thunderbird looks great, however
Chromium and
Explorer appear very soft.
Again, I have attached screenshots (gdipp 0.7.4, gdipp 0.7.3, and gdi++) for
reference.
Cheers,
James
x
Original comment by [email protected]
on 12 Apr 2010 at 12:03
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
Attachments:
- [gdipp - 0.7.4 - Explorer.png](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/gdipp/issue-25/comment-8/gdipp - 0.7.4 - Explorer.png)
- [gdipp - 0.7.3 - Explorer.png](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/gdipp/issue-25/comment-8/gdipp - 0.7.3 - Explorer.png)
- [gdi++ - Explorer.png](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/gdipp/issue-25/comment-8/gdi++ - Explorer.png)
- [gdipp - 0.7.4 - Chromium options.png](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/gdipp/issue-25/comment-8/gdipp - 0.7.4 - Chromium options.png)
- [gdipp - 0.7.3 - Chromium options.png](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/gdipp/issue-25/comment-8/gdipp - 0.7.3 - Chromium options.png)
- [gdi++ - Chromium options.png](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/gdipp/issue-25/comment-8/gdi++ - Chromium options.png)
from gdipp.
Regarding to "too bold" problem:
More comprehensive answers can be found here:
http://code.google.com/p/gdipp/issues/detail?id=34.
"Since 0.7.4, gdipp has the ability to render ANY weight the program requests."
If
your programs request that, gdipp obeys.
Regarding to "too soft" question:
0.7.4 reduces the default shadow alpha. You can try to increase it.
Original comment by [email protected]
on 12 Apr 2010 at 4:23
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
Thank you, and yes I just read about the flexible font weighting ability.
Do you know if gdi++ offers such functionality?
Would it be possible to request an 'old style' option to restrict rendering to
the
simple 400/700 system used by ClearType?
>0.7.4 reduces the default shadow alpha. You can try to increase it.
Yes, I noticed this also, however I always set alpha to 0 immediately after
reinstalling gdipp (I personally don't find the shadowing improves legibility),
so I
don't believe this is the issue. It would appear that the normal weight on
some UI
elements is simply too 'light' to begin with - I suspect this may also relate
to the
flexible weighting functionality outlined above.
Cheers,
James
x
Original comment by [email protected]
on 12 Apr 2010 at 4:31
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
If I can see enough evidence showing that GDI really ignores other weight
values, I
will revert to emulate GDI's behavior. This is only a regression of the current
weight ability, thus can be done easily. Still, compatibility is one of the most
important thing gdipp considers. I just wonder why GDI exhibits such ignoring
behavior. Maybe Microsoft's burden of compatibility is much more heavier than
what we
can imagine.
If program requests weight as 200 or 100, gdipp will render it very faintly.
Original comment by [email protected]
on 12 Apr 2010 at 4:54
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
I see.
Do you know what weight the Windows explorer icon text (including desktop), or
perhaps the Chromium options window in the screenshots above are 'requested'
to be
rendered at?
Cheers,
James
x
Original comment by [email protected]
on 12 Apr 2010 at 5:02
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
400 for Explorer. I think Chrome should be the same. gdipp works perfect in my
own
machine.
Original comment by [email protected]
on 12 Apr 2010 at 7:42
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
Should be fixed in 0.7.5.
Original comment by [email protected]
on 16 Apr 2010 at 7:14
- Changed state: Fixed
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
from gdipp.
Thank you. 0.7.5 fixes the issue with some UI elements being rendered too
softly.
However, I note that my window titles are now too bold.
I believe gdipp may be rendering 'faux-bold' (i.e. fonts that do not have a
separate
bold file) too heavily.
The OS X theme I am using utilises the 'Lucida Grande' font, yet strangely,
despite
the separate 'Lucida Grande Bold' file being available, the system still
chooses to
use a faux-bold version of the normal 'Lucida Grande' font. I wonder if I need
to
edit the .msstyle theme or even the .ttf file in some way to specify that the
bold
version of the font is part of the same family?
Cheers,
James
x
Original comment by [email protected]
on 19 Apr 2010 at 12:05
- Added labels: ****
- Removed labels: ****
Attachments:
- [gdipp - 0.7.5 - Explorer.png](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/gdipp/issue-25/comment-15/gdipp - 0.7.5 - Explorer.png)
from gdipp.
Related Issues (20)
- Most programs don't work with gdipp
- Underline for checked e-mail in MS Outlook is invisible
- Font rendering broken in Google Chrome(menu bar and tab title, etc)
- Font rendering broken in Google Chrome(menu bar and tab title, etc) HOT 9
- Is there a way to set process specific font settings?
- Renderer works on Windows but not with Google Chrome
- Text in Chrome browser is malformed HOT 3
- 使用之后谷歌浏览器的tabs, setting menu, favourite bar 等地方的字全部坏了,看不清楚 HOT 1
- Jagged text on QQ2013 Beta 8056
- render invalid character HOT 3
- cannot spawn mintty.exe with gdipp_loader_32.exe HOT 1
- Text not visible in Opera tabs, or right click. HOT 1
- Chrome 30+ fixes font rendering? HOT 1
- Text rendering working again in Chrome 30+?
- Lowercase letter L missing in Topaz Labs Plug-ins for Photoshop CC Windows 8 64 Bit HOT 1
- What is going on with FB Messenger?
- Steam unreadable with gdipp. HOT 1
- Unable to preview Source Han Sans / Noto Sans CJK with gdipp enabled in Win8.1
- Ho to remove completely gdipp
- Avast judges as...
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from gdipp.