Methods properties about chebfun

[nickhale]

I have no opinion on this.

[aaustin141]

I don't have any strong feelings about this either.

[mhsnjvd]

I just talked with Anthony and we are happy with the way things are currently. We are not explicitly stating method properties.

[nickhale]

Some classes do, and some classes don't. Should we at least aim to be consistent?

[mhsnjvd]

After a discussion with @asgeirbirkis here is what I am doing.

All class def files will generally have three types of methods, in the following order:
1). constructor
2). Non-static
3). Static

We will explicitly state their properties.

I will soon issue a pull request related to this.

[nickhale]

There's also the sub-types abstract, 'concrete', and hidden.

[mhsnjvd]

There are also non-static private. What do people suggest in these cases?

[mhsnjvd]

AA is touching almost all the constructor files today and has asked me to do these style changes once he is done with his work. Freezing for now.

[nickhale]

@mhsnjvd -- what's the status of this?

[mhsnjvd]

#879 closes this.