Comments (18)
Hi everyone, I'm running some tests of the landfast parameterization with JF on the gx1 grid and we want to check the bathymetry file. Is there a netCDF version of the gx1 grid ? the version I've downloaded from the GitHub wiki is in binary format (CICE_data/grid/gx1/grid_gx1.bin).
from cice.
Hi Philippe, I don't think we've ever put the gx1 grid data into netcdf. It exists for gx3.
from cice.
I have netCDF versions that we use in CESM. The problem is that the KMT (land-ocean mask) may be different from your grid. I will send it by email and you can try it out.
from cice.
Hi everyone,
I just finished running some tests of the new parameterizations (grounding, ellipse ratio, tensile strength) on the gx1 grid with the latest bathymetry files that JF created. The parameterizations work as expected : increasing k1
and Ktens
increases the amount of landfast ice, and decreasing e_ratio
also increases the amount of landfast ice.
The attached images show the landfast area for the East Siberian, Laptev and Kara seas. The standard run is with basal stress turned off, and default values for e_ratio
(2.) and Ktens
(0.). All other runs are with basal stress turned on. When not indicated otherwise, parameters are k1
=8., e_ratio
=2., Ktens
=0.
Note that the initial condition has a lot of ice, particularly in the East Siberian sea, and so the agreement with the data is not perfect.
from cice.
@phil-blain, thank you for this! It would be nice to include these results as part of our "sample output" pages for the CICE v6 release. @duvivier and I have been thinking about how to organize that. Do you have maps with and without fast ice, or is it not really visible that way? What is the metric you use to identify fast ice in these timeseries plots?
from cice.
Yes, I do have boolean maps showing where the ice is landfast for the different runs. I can post some here if you like. As for the metric : from daily model outputs, we compute the mean ice concentration and velocity (in magnitude) over a 14 days period. If the concentration > 0.5 and the velocity < 5E-4, the ice is considered landfast.
from cice.
This is the same metric we used in our papers on landfast ice (e.g. Lemieux et al 2016). Philippe, I suggest you show maps (3) of the landfast ice cover at the end of April for the NIC data, the standard model and the run with e=1.4 (and k1=8).
from cice.
So, are you ready for me to issue the PR on this?
from cice.
Go ahead Dave. Thanks for your help on this.
I also wanted to test how are the stresses when we change the parameters for the ellipse (not sure this is the right place to post these...maybe also on the sample output page?). Here is a plot of the normalized principal stresses. The yield curve changes are consistent with the modified parameters.
from cice.
Here are the maps showing the landfast cells, for the standard run and the one with k1=8
, e_ratio=0.2
. The NIC data is interpolated on a higher resolution grid (0.25° ).
from cice.
Very nice, thank you. (I like the ellipse plots too!) It's clear that the landfast ice "sticks" to whatever little point of land (or island) is jutting out into the flow. Have you done resolution studies to see how much that matters? The ocean bathymetry resolution probably also makes some difference.
from cice.
I don't think we should spend too much time with gx3 as this is too low resolution for landfast ice. Here is however a map of landfast ice at pretty much the same time (2005-04-25) from our latest 0.25 degree CICE-NEMO simulation (with CICE4...but with the same parameterizations). Sorry for the different view of the Arctic...
from cice.
Thanks @JFLemieux73
For the 'sample output' pages we want to show output from actual test runs, so that users can reproduce them to verify that their setup is correct. We never recommend using gx3 for science.
This all looks great to me!
from cice.
JF and I did a quick test of the basal stress parameterization with the EAP rheology. This had not been tested before. The results look good.
from cice.
@JFLemieux73 @phil-blain
I have added these figures to the "Sample output page"
https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/CICE/wiki/CICE-Sample-output#cice-v600---landfast-ice
I'm not sure if we should include both the sets of seasonal figures, but you can let me know if I should remove one. I also added some preliminary captions but I can modify these as you wish too.
from cice.
Thanks Alice! I've just tried to do some slight modifications to the captions by following the procedure at the bottom of the CICE-Sample-Output page but I think I'm not authorized to do that (remote: Permission to CICE-Consortium/CICE.wiki.git denied to phil-blain.
). Anyway, the Kara and Laptev captions are inversed in the EAP figures, and for the first yearly figure I'd go with "Area of landfast ice ...... with various parameters" since we vary different parameters than the ellipse ratio.
from cice.
Fixed those captions, thanks Phil!
from cice.
Was this addressed fully by PR #222? If so, should we close the issue?
from cice.
Related Issues (20)
- dsnow optional argument in icepack_step_therm1 HOT 2
- evp1d performance evaluation
- Support netcdf-4 compression & chunking HOT 1
- hist_avg on multiple streams writes the same filenames when .false. HOT 9
- Potential instability related to explicit treatment of Coriolis for C-grid HOT 3
- Arguments in update_state need if present. HOT 2
- dynamics U points are active when T points are not HOT 5
- Commit/PR process HOT 3
- PIO and hdf5 failures HOT 6
- Test various restart formats and add Derecho port that uses pio spack HOT 1
- tripole initial/restart file with inconsistent values on the tripole seam HOT 15
- CICE C-grid crash on 1/12 degree tripole HOT 11
- Can we remove `nprocs` from `ice_in` ? HOT 6
- FSD heat / water / salt conservation
- PIO createfile where path is a symlink
- Minor modifications required in documentation HOT 3
- Unnecessary calculations for uvel, vvel for the C-grid HOT 5
- Questions about the computer configuration required to run HOT 1
- Make a_min and m_min adjustable
- NCAR derecho compilers HOT 3
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from cice.