Inaccurate result display when adding a new show about pe

[soc-se-bot]

Team's Response

Reason

This is an intended behaviour as we want to inform the user that they have not assigned a rating or written a comment to the show they have added. We are rejecting this issue as we feel that this is not a severity.Low bug at all since the operation of the application is not affected at all and it does not cause any inconvenience to the users. We are also downgrading the severity of this issue to severity.VeryLow due to the above reason.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: The user guide did not specify the default behaviour of an optional field. Given there are a lot of different ways to handle optional field behaviour such as populating the field with a default value, nil, NULL or undefined, this behaviour should be properly documented in the user guide as mentioned in the bug report guideline.

Since the behaviour is not documented in the user guide, I would assume that the Dev team would handle this behaviour by informing the users via other means -- the display response for this scenario. However, the user would instead receive a confusing message - New show added: All of us are dead; Status: plan-to-watch; Rating: 0; Comment: ; Tags: [Horror]; despite not using c/ and r/ in the command.

Moving forward

The optional field visual bug could be avoided in the following examples:

1. New show added: All of us are dead; Status: plan-to-watch; Rating: 0; Comment: No Comment; Tags: [Horror];

OR

New show added: All of us are dead; Status: plan-to-watch; Tags: [Horror];
Rating: Not specified;
Comment: Not specified;

OR
3. Remove unused prefixes

![image.png](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/clement0010/pe/master/files/21ee12ef-4178-4210-b16a-49f9b6f138cf.png)







-------------------
## :question: Issue severity

Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`]
Originally [`severity.Low`]

- [x] I disagree

**Reason for disagreement:** This is not a cosmetic bug. Justification is the same as above.

-------------------