Support for python 3 about adol-c

[kkulshre]

Hi. It would be best if you open a pull-request with a fix, so that we are compatible with both python2 and python3.

[DiegoRomeres]

Hi, is there any news on this topic? Is anybody planning to make it compatible with python3?

[kkulshre]

As I wrote before, anyone who feels like it, please open a pull-request with the fix.

[bradbell]

cppad_py is an alternative that works with python3; see
https://cppad-py.readthedocs.io/

[cklb]

Hi there,

as Python 2 did reach end of life quite some time ago, I think it would be a good Idea to support Python 3 from now on forward. (Just to be clear, the current swig wrapper works with 3.11, you just can't do any division.)

I went ahead and made the required changes, however due to #42 I had to make some more changes to the build system that are possibly a little hackish.
In my opinion, it would be best to resolve the problems with the buildsystem first. Afterwards I will gladly add a test case for the changes.

My changes can be found in 7b0078e .

Best,
Stefan

[awalther1]

Hi Stefan,

thanks a lot for your comment!!

We also found some issues with the build system. I will try to integrate them within the next two weeks. It would be great if you could provide a test case after that.

Best regards

Andrea

[cklb]

No problem, if you post it here I'll be notified.

FYI: My changes to the build system can be found in https://github.com/cklb/ADOL-C/tree/makepkg

[awalther1]

Hi Stefan,

I just tried to adapt the build system correspondingly. However, I was not completely successful. Could we discuss these issue to fix it? That would be great.

Best regards

Andrea

[cklb]

Hey,

a few weeks ago, a colleague of mine made some changes to get the build running again. I don't think that he is on Github by luckily he collected his changes (based on the 2.7.2 release) in form of a patch and provided a package for the archlinux user repository which you can find here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-adolc.
The patch itself can be found here: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/setup.patch?h=python-adolc.

Best,
Stefan

[awalther1]

Hey,

thanks a lot for the patch. It should be included now in the master branch. However, the installation does not work on my system. It would be great if you could give it a try to check whether it works on your system? That might help to identify the reason.

Thanks and best regards

Andrea

[cklb]

Hey,

it seems like one line of the patch did not get included on the master branch, it is the line 217 in ADOL-C/swig/setup.py:

-      version='2.7-trunk',
+      version='2.7.2',

without that change, the packaging module gives
packaging.version.InvalidVersion: Invalid version: '2.7-trunk' .

However, after applying that line a myriad of similar compile errors arise from the wrapper class.
One example:

adolc-python_wrap.cpp: In Funktion »adub* badouble___pow____SWIG_1(badouble*, double)«:
adolc-python_wrap.cpp:5353:16: Fehler: ungültige Umwandlung von Typ »adub« in Typ »adub*«
 5353 |         return (adub*) pow((*(self)),c);

I think the problem here is that the patch is based on the last available tagged version of ADOL-C (https://github.com/coin-or/ADOL-C/releases/tag/releases%2F2.7.2) and in the meantime changes were made to the C++ code that did not get ported to the swig wrapper, possibly because no one was using the python extension.
However, as adolc-python_wrap.cpp is generated by swig itself, the culprit is probably the interface definition in adolc-python.i.

The build commands I used are

autoreconf -fi
./configure --enable-sparse --enable-python
make 
make install

Best,
Stefan

[awalther1]

Hi,

oK, this is the same behaviour that I observe. I will try to trace down the reason for this and to fix the interface definition.

Best regards

Andrea