Comments (9)
VDA-Datenaustausch
commented on May 27, 2024
I will check this and come back a.s.a.p
from einvoicing-en16931.
VDA-Datenaustausch
commented on May 27, 2024
Mapping corrected - SG 3 is now mapped correctly.
Please crosscheck.
from einvoicing-en16931.
phax
commented on May 27, 2024
The SG3 stuff is fixed. There is one difference left:
Example 1 generated:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<List>
<M_INVOIC>Checked in file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<M_INVOIC>Same for example 2, 3, 4 and 5 (I stopped there).
Additionally when validating example 2, the following error occurs:
Usage validate_transaction example_number
Conversion to XSD java -jar map2xml-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar "..\instance\EDIFACT_EXAMPLE2.txt"
Mapping Application
Warning: Line 143 column 38 (offset 0xd82): Envelope / Interchange / Group / Object / UNP: Segment 'SlZCRVJpMHhMalVOQ2lV
TkNqRWdNQ0J2WW1vT3k2SlRaWDliY2dSVnhJVkcuLi50Ykxvc0NoVTJYUmY5eGIvb21zY2dUWS9sWEVoVWI=UNP' is unrecognized.
Warning: Line 143 column 145 (offset 0xded): Envelope / Interchange / Group / Object / UNP: Segment 'SlZCRVJpMHhMalVOQ2l
VTkNqRWdNQ0J2WW1vT3k2SlRaWDliY2dSVnhJVkcuLi50Ykxvc0NoVTJYUmY5eGIvb21zY2dUWS9sWEVoVWI=UNP' is unexpected.
Warning: Line 143 column 145 (offset 0xded): Envelope: The following text was not parsed: '+104+P1'
Finished
Conversion done!
Validating XSD "..\schema\INVOIC_D14B_ISO20625.xsd" "..\instance\EDIFACT_EXAMPLE2.xml"
Starting validation against ERROR - [error] @ file:/D:/Entwicklung/git/validation/edifact/validator/../instance/EDIFACT_
EXAMPLE2.xml(1131:12) [SAX] cvc-complex-type.2.4.b: Content des Elements 'S_UNO' ist nicht vollstõndig. '{C_S302, C_S301
, C_S300, D_0035}' wird erwartet. (org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.b: Content des Elements 'S_UNO' i
st nicht vollstõndig. '{C_S302, C_S301, C_S300, D_0035}' wird erwartet.)
ERROR - [error] @ file:/D:/Entwicklung/git/validation/edifact/validator/../instance/EDIFACT_EXAMPLE2.xml(1132:14) [SAX]
cvc-complex-type.2.4.b: Content des Elements 'P_OBJECT' ist nicht vollstõndig. '{DATA}' wird erwartet. (org.xml.sax.SAXP
arseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.b: Content des Elements 'P_OBJECT' ist nicht vollstõndig. '{DATA}' wird erwartet.)
XSD validation done!
Validating Schematron "..\schematron\EN16931-EDIFACT-validation.sch" "..\instance\EDIFACT_EXAMPLE2.xml
from einvoicing-en16931.
VDA-Datenaustausch
commented on May 27, 2024
Root elemet will be
<M_INVOIC>
With kind regards
Jörg Walther
from einvoicing-en16931.
VDA-Datenaustausch
commented on May 27, 2024
The content between ONO and UNP should be deleted by the test bed, but I will delete them from the messages as well – the converter tool cannot deal with this.
To be sure, I removed the mapping of UNO..UNP from the mapping -> they will be ignored by the converter.
However, this will lead to an error in the syntax validation since the number of segments contained in the UNT segment will differ from the number of segments actually left in the message
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/With kind regards
Jörg Walther
from einvoicing-en16931.
VDA-Datenaustausch
commented on May 27, 2024
All updated,
please test,
Jörg
from einvoicing-en16931.
phax
commented on May 27, 2024
Schaut gut aus. Nur bei Example7 gibt es noch relevante Diskrepanzen:
S_TAX/C_C243
ist im alten File drin (Zeile 245, Zeile 302 und Zeile 348) - wenn auch leer.
Anbei die neu generierte Datei:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<M_INVOIC>
<S_UNH>
<D_0062>INVOICE_test_7</D_0062>
<C_S009>
<D_0065>INVOIC</D_0065>
<D_0052>D</D_0052>
<D_0054>14B</D_0054>
<D_0051>UN</D_0051>
</C_S009>
</S_UNH>
<S_BGM>
<C_C002>
<D_1001>380</D_1001>
</C_C002>
<C_C106>
<D_1004>INVOICE_test_7</D_1004>
</C_C106>
</S_BGM>
<S_DTM>
<C_C507>
<D_2005>137</D_2005>
<D_2380>20130513</D_2380>
<D_2379>102</D_2379>
</C_C507>
</S_DTM>
<S_DTM>
<C_C507>
<D_2005>167</D_2005>
<D_2380>20130101</D_2380>
<D_2379>102</D_2379>
</C_C507>
</S_DTM>
<S_DTM>
<C_C507>
<D_2005>168</D_2005>
<D_2380>20131231</D_2380>
<D_2379>102</D_2379>
</C_C507>
</S_DTM>
<S_FTX>
<D_4451>AAB</D_4451>
<C_C108>
<D_4440>Payment within 30 days</D_4440>
</C_C108>
</S_FTX>
<S_FTX>
<D_4451>GEN</D_4451>
<C_C108>
<D_4440>Testscenario 7</D_4440>
</C_C108>
</S_FTX>
<S_FTX>
<D_4451>DOC</D_4451>
<C_C107>
<D_4441>P1</D_4441>
</C_C107>
<C_C108>
<D_4440>urn:cen.eu:en16931:2017</D_4440>
</C_C108>
</S_FTX>
<S_FTX>
<D_4451>AGM</D_4451>
<C_C108>
<D_4440>Tax</D_4440>
</C_C108>
</S_FTX>
<G_SG1>
<S_RFF>
<C_C506>
<D_1153>ON</D_1153>
<D_1154>Order_9988_x</D_1154>
</C_C506>
</S_RFF>
</G_SG1>
<G_SG2>
<S_NAD>
<D_3035>SE</D_3035>
<C_C082>
<D_3039>5532331183</D_3039>
</C_C082>
<C_C080>
<D_3036>The Sellercompany Incorporated</D_3036>
<D_3036_2>Civic Service Centre</D_3036_2>
</C_C080>
<C_C059>
<D_3042>Main street 2, Building 4</D_3042>
</C_C059>
<D_3164>Big city</D_3164>
<D_3251>54321</D_3251>
<D_3207>SE</D_3207>
</S_NAD>
<S_FII>
<D_3035>RB</D_3035>
<C_C078>
<D_3194>SE1212341234123412</D_3194>
</C_C078>
<C_C088>
<D_3433>SEXDABCD</D_3433>
</C_C088>
</S_FII>
<S_FII>
<D_3035>RB</D_3035>
<C_C078>
<D_3194>SE1212341234123412</D_3194>
</C_C078>
</S_FII>
<G_SG5>
<S_CTA>
<D_3139>SU</D_3139>
<C_C056>
<D_3412>Anthon Larsen</D_3412>
</C_C056>
</S_CTA>
<S_COM>
<C_C076>
<D_3148>4698989898</D_3148>
<D_3155>TE</D_3155>
</C_C076>
</S_COM>
<S_COM>
<C_C076>
<D_3148>[email protected]</D_3148>
<D_3155>EM</D_3155>
</C_C076>
</S_COM>
</G_SG5>
</G_SG2>
<G_SG2>
<S_NAD>
<D_3035>BY</D_3035>
<C_C080>
<D_3036>THe Buyercompany</D_3036>
</C_C080>
<C_C059>
<D_3042>Anystreet 8</D_3042>
<D_3042_2>Back door</D_3042_2>
</C_C059>
<D_3164>Anytown</D_3164>
<C_C819>
<D_3228>RegionB</D_3228>
</C_C819>
<D_3251>101</D_3251>
<D_3207>SE</D_3207>
</S_NAD>
<G_SG5>
<S_CTA>
<D_3139>SU</D_3139>
<C_C056>
<D_3412>3150bdn</D_3412>
</C_C056>
</S_CTA>
<S_COM>
<C_C076>
<D_3148>5121230</D_3148>
<D_3155>TE</D_3155>
</C_C076>
</S_COM>
<S_COM>
<C_C076>
<D_3148>[email protected]</D_3148>
<D_3155>EM</D_3155>
</C_C076>
</S_COM>
</G_SG5>
</G_SG2>
<G_SG7>
<S_CUX>
<C_C504>
<D_6347>2</D_6347>
<D_6345>SEK</D_6345>
</C_C504>
</S_CUX>
</G_SG7>
<G_SG8>
<S_PYT>
<D_4279>1</D_4279>
</S_PYT>
<S_PAI>
<C_C534>
<D_4461>30</D_4461>
</C_C534>
</S_PAI>
</G_SG8>
<G_SG27>
<S_LIN>
<D_1082>1</D_1082>
</S_LIN>
<S_PIA>
<D_4347>5</D_4347>
<C_C212>
<D_7140>RT3000</D_7140>
<D_7143>SA</D_7143>
</C_C212>
</S_PIA>
<S_IMD>
<D_7077>F</D_7077>
<C_C273>
<D_7008>Road tax</D_7008>
</C_C273>
</S_IMD>
<S_IMD>
<D_7077>A</D_7077>
<C_C273>
<D_7008>Weight-based tax, vehicles >3000 KGM</D_7008>
</C_C273>
</S_IMD>
<S_QTY>
<C_C186>
<D_6063>47</D_6063>
<D_6060>1</D_6060>
<D_6411>C62</D_6411>
</C_C186>
</S_QTY>
<G_SG28>
<S_MOA>
<C_C516>
<D_5025>203</D_5025>
<D_5004>2500</D_5004>
</C_C516>
</S_MOA>
</G_SG28>
<G_SG30>
<S_PRI>
<C_C509>
<D_5125>AAA</D_5125>
<D_5118>2500</D_5118>
</C_C509>
</S_PRI>
</G_SG30>
<G_SG31>
<S_RFF>
<C_C506>
<D_1153>ON</D_1153>
<D_1156>1</D_1156>
</C_C506>
</S_RFF>
</G_SG31>
<G_SG35>
<S_TAX>
<D_5283>7</D_5283>
<C_C241>
<D_5153>VAT</D_5153>
</C_C241>
<D_5305>O</D_5305>
</S_TAX>
</G_SG35>
</G_SG27>
<G_SG27>
<S_LIN>
<D_1082>2</D_1082>
</S_LIN>
<S_PIA>
<D_4347>5</D_4347>
<C_C212>
<D_7140>REG</D_7140>
<D_7143>SA</D_7143>
</C_C212>
</S_PIA>
<S_IMD>
<D_7077>F</D_7077>
<C_C273>
<D_7008>Road Register fee</D_7008>
</C_C273>
</S_IMD>
<S_IMD>
<D_7077>A</D_7077>
<C_C273>
<D_7008>Annual registration fee</D_7008>
</C_C273>
</S_IMD>
<S_QTY>
<C_C186>
<D_6063>47</D_6063>
<D_6060>1</D_6060>
<D_6411>C62</D_6411>
</C_C186>
</S_QTY>
<G_SG28>
<S_MOA>
<C_C516>
<D_5025>203</D_5025>
<D_5004>700</D_5004>
</C_C516>
</S_MOA>
</G_SG28>
<G_SG30>
<S_PRI>
<C_C509>
<D_5125>AAA</D_5125>
<D_5118>700</D_5118>
</C_C509>
</S_PRI>
</G_SG30>
<G_SG35>
<S_TAX>
<D_5283>7</D_5283>
<C_C241>
<D_5153>VAT</D_5153>
</C_C241>
<D_5305>O</D_5305>
</S_TAX>
</G_SG35>
</G_SG27>
<S_UNS>
<D_0081>S</D_0081>
</S_UNS>
<G_SG52>
<S_MOA>
<C_C516>
<D_5025>79</D_5025>
<D_5004>3200</D_5004>
</C_C516>
</S_MOA>
</G_SG52>
<G_SG52>
<S_MOA>
<C_C516>
<D_5025>389</D_5025>
<D_5004>3200</D_5004>
</C_C516>
</S_MOA>
</G_SG52>
<G_SG52>
<S_MOA>
<C_C516>
<D_5025>388</D_5025>
<D_5004>3200</D_5004>
</C_C516>
</S_MOA>
</G_SG52>
<G_SG52>
<S_MOA>
<C_C516>
<D_5025>9</D_5025>
<D_5004>3200</D_5004>
</C_C516>
</S_MOA>
</G_SG52>
<G_SG54>
<S_TAX>
<D_5283>7</D_5283>
<C_C241>
<D_5153>VAT</D_5153>
</C_C241>
<D_5305>O</D_5305>
</S_TAX>
<S_MOA>
<C_C516>
<D_5025>125</D_5025>
<D_5004>3200</D_5004>
</C_C516>
</S_MOA>
<S_MOA>
<C_C516>
<D_5025>124</D_5025>
<D_5004>0</D_5004>
</C_C516>
</S_MOA>
</G_SG54>
<S_UNT>
<D_0074>49</D_0074>
<D_0062>INVOICE_test_7</D_0062>
</S_UNT>
</M_INVOIC>
from einvoicing-en16931.
VDA-Datenaustausch
commented on May 27, 2024
Hallo Philip,
danke für die Prüfung.
Das Verhalten ist aber so in Ordnung.
Die EDIFACT-Nachricht enthält ein leeres Datenelement in einem Gruppendatenelement.
So sieht das Original aus
TAX+7+VAT+++:::+O'
So wäre es richtig
TAX+7+VAT++++O'
Da kein Inhalt im DE ist, wird auch kein Ziel-Datenelement in XML gebildet und damit auch keine Gruppe.
Würde das Mapping anders arbeiten, müßte der Validator nicht nur prüfen, dass Pflicht-Datenelemente in XML vorhanden sind, sondern immer auch, dass sie nicht leer sind.
from einvoicing-en16931.
phax
commented on May 27, 2024
Okay - if you think it is okay, it is okay :)
from einvoicing-en16931.
Related Issues (20)
- BR-17 rule checks too hard? HOT 4
- Typo in rule-text UBL-CR-583, UBL-CR-577 and UBL-CR-572 (UBL) HOT 1
- Typo in rule-text UBL-CR-282, UBL-CR-247 and UBL-CR-183 (UBL) HOT 1
- UBL-SR-51 does not check cac:DeliveryLocation HOT 1
- Error in Validation of Rule BR-E-08 HOT 1
- CII - missing cardinality check for ApplicableTradeTax (BG-30) HOT 1
- Validate line total HOT 1
- `UBL-SR-43` using attribute `scheme` instead of `schemeID` HOT 1
- CII BT-17 and BT-18 checks to be improved HOT 1
- CII Missing check on DefinedTradeContact cardinality HOT 1
- Cardinality of DesignatedProductClassification in CII might stop the check BR-65
- add missing currency codes HOT 2
- Bug in CII BR-65 HOT 3
- Add EAS code 0218 HOT 1
- BR-17 fails on equal payee and seller
- Move PEPPOL-EN16931-R046 rule to EN16931? HOT 2
- UBL-SR-32 HOT 9
- missing cardinality check for Value added tax point date (BT-7) and Value added tax point date code (BT-8) in CII HOT 1
- Undocumented and missing changes in v.1.3.11 release HOT 3
- BR-33 / BR-CO-21 rules validation doesn't work on CII files (OK on UBL files) HOT 1
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from einvoicing-en16931.