implement Usage about zfs

[fuweid]

@AkihiroSuda @dmcgowan I prefer to use ZFS-native model as default instead of native-diff. In production, some apps like nodejs/python has a lot of small files and native-diff will consumes cpu resources in containerd side. It is cool to have ZFS-native model and native-diff both, and the switch is up to user's configuration.

[ukd1]

Are there any plans to fix this? I'm still getting these errors...

[sigxcpu76]

Until there is a final and good solution for this, can we get a quick patch instead? This generates tons of useless logging.

[apnar]

Just ran into this issue as well. I expect it to be more frequent with Ubuntu 20.04 offering root on ZFS support now. The default microk8s install still uses native snapshotter but there is a how-to here https://microk8s.io/docs/install-alternatives on switching to ZFS snapshotter which triggers tons of error messages about Usage not being implemented unless you tweak the logging way down.

I imagine this would be a quick add for someone familiar with the code now that the decision to use ZFS native output was made above, but if no one has the time I may try diving into it.

[AkihiroSuda]

@stevvooe @dmcgowan

Do we need to implement this before v1.1 GA?

If so, I'll port over btrfs implementation for consistency, rather than adopting the zfs-native USED value mentioned above.

containerd/containerd#1871

[dmcgowan]

I didn't realize we didn't have usage implemented yet. I probably would have suggested we either implement it or not have it enabled by default. I think we are too late for 1.1.0 but we can fix for 1.1.1.

[AkihiroSuda]

Still not sure whether we should use naive differ as we did for btrfs (containerd/containerd#1871), or use filesystem-native usage value, which we didn't adopt for btrfs (containerd/containerd#1836).

For consistency with btrfs/overlayfs, probably we should use the former one, but for performance and future potential support of zfs quota, we should use ZFS-native usage value.

Maybe we should support both and make them configurable?

[dalbani]

Hey, I found this bug when trying to understand why I had hundreds of message in the logs of containerd in a MicroK8s environment with a ZFS snapshotter.
For example:
microk8s.daemon-containerd[19500]: time="2020-01-17T21:56:56.725325357Z" level=error msg="Failed to get usage for snapshot "sha256:xxxxxx" error="zfs does not implement Usage() yet"
I suppose it doesn't affect the functionality / reliability of the setup, but it would be nice not to have all those errors in the logs ;-)

Note to self: I see an entry stats_collect_period = 10 in containerd-template.toml, so I suppose that's the reason why the error messages are logged every 10 seconds.

[fuweid]

@dalbani you are right. cri-containerd will collect usage about container snapshotters very stats_collect_period seconds. For the overlay/native/... snapshotter, Usage call will be act like du which means that it is time-consuming job. cri-containerd uses goroutine to collect data background. When kubelet wants to know the container status, cri-containerd will return the cache updated by that goroutine.

If not to have all those errors, zfs needs Usage implementation.

[AkihiroSuda]

@fuweid @dmcgowan WDYT: #17 (comment)

[fuweid]

close by #38