Notation Clash about corn

[spitters]

Thanks. I'll investigate. This soundn't happen.

…

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Robert Rand ***@***.***> wrote: The file CLogic.v defines the following two notations: Notation "{ x : A | P }" := (sigT (fun x : A => P):CProp) (at level 0, x at level 99) : type_scope. Notation "{ x : A | P | Q }" := (sig2T A (fun x : A => P) (fun x : A => Q)) (at level 0, x at level 99) : type_scope. However the Coq standard library (at least as of 8.5) has the following notations: Notation "{ x : A | P }" := (sig (A:=A) (fun x => P)) : type_scope. Notation "{ x : A | P & Q }" := (sig2 (A:=A) (fun x => P) (fun x => Q)) : type_scope. Notation "{ x : A & P }" := (sigT (A:=A) (fun x => P)) : type_scope. Notation "{ x : A & P & Q }" := (sigT2 (A:=A) (fun x => P) (fun x => Q)) : type_scope. The first notation clashes with CLogic's notation, the last two notations seem to express what the CLogic notation intends. This is breaking developments that depend on CoRN, for instance the quantum computing library here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ fhldyg1mfnxdmcl/AAAvQZz1i1mjdL5TKzwcWwyva/CoRN?dl=0 — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#39>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAM2zpJil8cKzIgk5g9g14zzyMW-4U_lks5rYYAhgaJpZM4L0yPk> .

[spitters]

I've updated again. Hoping it is better now.
One problem is that the quantum guys never made a proper release, or contributed code to the main branch.
Their README says they are still depending on v8.4, which we don't support.

[rnrand]

Did you commit something new to the repository?

Also, it sounds like the quantum guys are in the process of moving over to MathComponents. I still might try to modify their current code to get it working with C-Corn.

[spitters]

The corn library compiles with 8.5. I am not sure what the quantum guys have been doing.
I guess we should ask @jaapb .

[spitters]

Closing this, as we are now following master,