DIR-615 firmware failed to extract about firmware-mod-kit

[GoogleCodeExporter]

The other BIN file on www.dd-wrt.com

# ./extract_firmware.sh dd-wrt-dlink-dir615d-revb-ddwrt-webflash.bin 
dlink-dir615/

 Firmware Mod Kit (extract) v0.64 beta, (c)2010 Jeremy Collake
 http://www.bitsum.com
 Checking for updates ...
  !!! There is a newer version available: 0.63
     You are currently using 0.64
 LINUX system detected. Compatibility ok.
 Testing file system of dlink-dir615/ ...
 Building tools ...
 Build seems successful.
 Preparing working directory ...
 Removing any previous files ...
 Creating directories ...
 Extracting firmware
 Attempting raw linux style firmware package (i.e. TEW-632BRP) ...
 Extracting dd-wrt-dlink-dir615d-revb-ddwrt-webflash.bin to dlink-dir615/ ...
 Error: filesystem not extracted properly.
  firmware image format not compatible?


# cat extract.log 
make: Entering directory `/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src'
make -C ./uncramfs/
make[1]: Entering directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/uncramfs'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/uncramfs'
make -C ./cramfs-2.x/
make[1]: Entering directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/cramfs-2.x'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/cramfs-2.x'
make -C ./squashfs-2.1-r2/
make[1]: Entering directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/squashfs-2.1-r2'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/squashfs-2.1-r2'
make -C ./squashfs-3.0/
make[1]: Entering directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/squashfs-3.0'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/squashfs-3.0'
make -C ./squashfs-3.0-lzma-damn-small-variant/
make[1]: Entering directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/squashfs-3.0-lzma-damn-small-v
ariant'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/squashfs-3.0-lzma-damn-small-v
ariant'
make -C ./wrt_vx_imgtool/
make[1]: Entering directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/wrt_vx_imgtool'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src/wrt_vx_imgtool'
make: Leaving directory `/home/wifi/fw-mod-kit/dlink-fw-mod-kit/trunk/src'
 untrx 0.54 beta - (c)2006-2010 Jeremy Collake
 Opening dd-wrt-dlink-dir615d-revb-ddwrt-webflash.bin
 read 3538972 bytes
  Writing dlink-dir615//image_parts/segment1
    size 3538944 from offset 28 ...
  Done!

Original comment by [email protected] on 6 Dec 2010 at 2:58

[GoogleCodeExporter]

The key is here:
" !!! There is a newer version available: 0.63
     You are currently using 0.64"
Please try the latest version. It should work, but if it doesn't then that 
format target firmware format is not supported.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Dec 2010 at 3:10

• Changed state: Done

[GoogleCodeExporter]

0.64 is newer than 0.63. I did svn checkout today.
How can I help you to support that firmware? 

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Dec 2010 at 7:28

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Oops, yes there is a discrepancy with the lame version checking hacked in. I am 
not interesting in adding support for this format, I am sorry. Maybe someone 
else is. I will fix the version check at least.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Dec 2010 at 7:37

• Changed state: WontFix

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I recommend trying an older revision (months old, prior to most recent major 
mod), as it may work. Otherwise, support is not available. I am sorry, I do not 
have time to add it. I believe DD-WRT is GPL, so in a perfect would one could 
compile their code. Perhaps you can go that route. Very sorry.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Dec 2010 at 11:44