`git hf feature submit` errors out if not using Github about gitflow

[stuartherbert]

Yeah. That's the only part of the Hubflow extension that actually knows about Github - it uses the Github API. I'm planning on removing this command unless there's a lot of users out there who rely on it.

[pgporada]

Stuart,

My team of ~12 people are wanting to use the feature but with BitBucket instead of Github. Is it possible to have some sort of check to see if the origin is Github or BitBucket and have the feature submit act accordingly?

[stuartherbert]

I'll take a look and see. Give me a little bit of time to investigate; I am not a BitBucket user.

On 28 Jul 2015, at 16:06, Phil Porada [email protected] wrote:

Stuart,

My team of ~12 people are wanting to use the feature but with BitBucket instead of Github. Is it possible to have some sort of check to see if the origin is Github or BitBucket and have the feature submit act accordingly?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[EslamElHusseiny]

@stuartherbert @pgporada I've addressed bitbucket support for "git hf feature submit" command here #88

[bitwiseman]

@stuartherbert - my team uses the automatic pull request creation. Can you make the check optional, so people can turn it off if they're not using github?

[EslamElHusseiny]

@bitwiseman what kind of git servers you're using rather than github and bitbucket ?

[ladyrassilon]

I have to say, creation of pull requests by command line are a really nice feature...

[tommynsong]

+1 for optional
we are using Github Enterprise