Command line flag or other means to output only the filenames that would be generated about djinni

[skabbes]

+1

[artwyman]

It's reasonably likely this would be almost as expensive as if you did the full run and simply ignored the output files, since Djinni would still need to parse all the input to know the set of output files. Saving the I/O cost of writing them would be worthwhile, though, and not too difficult.

Another alternative here would be a mode in which Djinni outputs a single file (with a predictable name you can use in GYP actions). That can't work for Java, though.

[mknejp]

This would be a help for tools like CMake.
CMake does have special targets to run code generators, but you have to supply it with the names of the generated files so it can do dependency analysis, know when to rebuild projects (for instance to add/remove generated files to Xcode projects) and stuff. So if it were possible to run djinni once to only get the output file names, capture them, and then forward them to the generator target, that might be a win.

Though this is yet hypothetical, we haven't integrated Djinni into our CMake toolchain yet.

[artwyman]

This is available now. See the --list-in-files and --list-out-files parameters.