Added parenthesis around await expression in if statement about jscodeshift

[Daniel15]

I do think this has to be changed in recast. @ElonVolo Have we thought about forking recast to roll in changes like this one without having to wait for upstream to merge them?

I personally use parentheses in these cases since it makes the statement less ambiguous :)

[techLeadGuy]

@Daniel15 I also do prefer parentheses for this cases and we'll probably going to use them if no fix can be applied shortly.
I believe I found the culprit in recast and offered to try to fix it, if the authors agree.

It's just that the transformation alters the input in ways we aren't expecting which is a bit scary, especially when applied to a large codebase.

[ElonVolo]

(saying this foolishly before glancing at code)That’s one of the reasons why I created evcodeshift, which I’m thinking (knock on wood) will solve techleadguy’s problem out of the box.Sent from my iPhoneOn Aug 2, 2023, at 16:41, Daniel Lo Nigro ***@***.***> wrote: I personally use parentheses in these cases since it makes the statement less ambiguous :) I do think this has to be fixed in recast though. @ElonVolo Have we thought about forking recast to roll in changes like this one without having to wait for upstream to merge them? —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[techLeadGuy]

@ElonVolo (coughs awkwardly while looking down) Well, actually.... evcodeshift has the same issue.