Should we translate Inline Resources? about cda-examples-to-fhir

[grahamegrieve]

I'm not sure what you mean?

Grahame

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:52 PM, niquola [email protected] wrote:

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/4
.

---

http://www.healthintersections.com.au /
[email protected]/ [phone]

[niquola]

For example MedicationPrescription references Medication Resource or prescriber (Participant resource), they could be treated as Resources or Inline Resources.

Should we translate them?

[grahamegrieve]

so you mean, should they be contained resources? In most cases, when doing
it automatically, there won't be much choice, since it's traditional, in
CDA, not to provide any identifying information. but in this case we can
simply inject identifying information and turn them into real resources.
And that would be preferred.

and yes, I'd like all the information to be there

Grahame

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:43 AM, niquola [email protected] wrote:

For example MedicationPrescription references Medication Resource or
prescriber (Participant resource), they could be treated as Resources or
Inline Resources.

Should we translate them?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/4#issuecomment-29749328
.

---

http://www.healthintersections.com.au /
[email protected]/ [phone]