Add return value to WithdrawBalance about fips

[anorth]

Thanks, sounds good to me

…

On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 10:40 am, Kaitlin Beegle ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @anorth <https://github.com/anorth>! I'm currently working to audit all open FIP discussion items so that we can triage existing issues and flag priorities that may have been missed. It looks like this issue was lost in the bundle of FIPs that were implemented prior to the Actors v5 launch. Is this the case? If so, we should reintroduce the idea and write a FIP draft. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#26 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADMW6UX4X3EKKARHMOJSMDT3R6IHANCNFSM4TIMP64A> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&utm_campaign=notification-email> .

[anorth]

This sounds great to me.

It's part of an open discussion, but this also sounds like a change that's inconsequential enough that we might not need to use the FIP process for it. Since it changes the actors API it will need to wait for the next major release (v3) of actors, but we're planning for that later this year.

@whyrusleeping @dignifiedquire @momack2 should we use the FIP process for this, or just go straight to implementation.

[dignifiedquire]

I would error on the side of creating a FIP for now, even if it is a simple one.

[kaitlin-beegle]

Hi @anorth! I'm currently working to audit all open FIP discussion items so that we can triage existing issues and flag priorities that may have been missed.

It looks like this issue was lost in the bundle of FIPs that were implemented prior to the Actors v5 launch. Is this the case? If so, we should reintroduce the idea and write a FIP draft.

[kaitlin-beegle]

This was implemented as FIP0020!