Midpoints about flatlib

[joaoventura]

Hi, this library is mostly for traditional astrology, so I'm not planning on including midpoints for now.

[ElHombre87]

I understand, but to quote you: On Thursday, June 21, 2018, 6:17:33 PM CDT, João Ventura <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, this library is mostly for traditional astrology, so I'm not planning on including midpoints for now. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[ElHombre87]

To quote you:Why are you open-sourcing flatlib?I really want to help push forward data-driven research in astrology. That is only possible with a strong community of researchers and good tools, so there was no point in keeping flatlib hidden on my hard disk. Flatlib is also a good tool for talking about astrology techniques. Someone can always point to the source code to explain how things can be done.--------I believe, if you are really supporting data-driven research. The more data you offer, the better. Midpoints are easy enough to calculate, so it really isn't a necessity, but it would be a nice addition.I think limiting this tool with traditional astrology is a mistake. One should weigh the pro's and con's of doing so.Thank you for this tool though. On Thursday, June 21, 2018, 6:17:33 PM CDT, João Ventura <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, this library is mostly for traditional astrology, so I'm not planning on including midpoints for now. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[lightflicker]

Hi @ElHombre87,

The code is in the open, well implemented and relatively easy to follow. Perhaps with investing a little bit of your time, you code it / fork it yourself?

Regards,
Marek