Protecting Mutation or Queries about django-graphql-jwt

[tutturen]

This issue contains helpful documentation, can I suggest that you add it to the main readme? ✍️ 😬

[mongkok]

Thanks for the feedback!

Of course, you can protect your queries and mutations verifying the info.context.user variable:

from django.contrib.auth import get_user_model

import graphene


class Query(graphene.ObjectType):
    me = graphene.Field(UserType)
    users = graphene.List(UserType)

    def resolve_me(self, info, **kwargs):
        user = info.context.user
        if user.is_anonymous:
            raise Exception('Authentication credentials were not provided')
        return user

    def resolve_users(self, info, **kwargs):
        user = info.context.user
        if not user.is_active or not user.is_staff:
            raise Exception('You do not have permission to perform this action')
        return get_user_model().objects.all()

As a shortcut, you can implement a @login_required and @staff_member_required decorators:

from functools import wraps


def context(f):
    def _context(func):
        def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
            info = args[f.__code__.co_varnames.index('info')]
            return func(info.context, *args, **kwargs)
        return wrapper
    return _context


def login_required(f):
    @wraps(f)
    @context(f)
    def wrapper(context, *args, **kwargs):
        if context.user.is_anonymous:
            raise Exception('Authentication credentials were not provided')
        return f(*args, **kwargs)
    return wrapper


def staff_member_required(f):
    @wraps(f)
    @context(f)
    def wrapper(context, *args, **kwargs):
        user = context.user
        if user.is_active and user.is_staff:
            return f(*args, **kwargs)
        raise Exception('You do not have permission to perform this action')
    return wrapper

Using decorators...

from django.contrib.auth import get_user_model

import graphene


class Query(graphene.ObjectType):
    me = graphene.Field(UserType)
    users = graphene.List(UserType)

    @login_required
    def resolve_me(self, info, **kwargs):
        return info.context.user

    @staff_member_required
    def resolve_users(self, info, **kwargs):
        return get_user_model().objects.all()

The same for mutations.

[maarcingebala]

@mongkok Shouldn't these decorators be a part of this package? I guess most people who use this package will need them anyway. Also, in the README there is a reference to login_requried, but it doesn't say to which one - Django's or a custom one. My intuition was to look for these decorators inside this package.
Aside from that, thanks for a very useful piece of code, it does exactly what I was looking for.

[mongkok]

I've included the auth decorators, you can find a full list of them and examples on the documentation.

Thanks for all your comments.

[mongkok]

Hi @CBinyenya,
do you have any question?,
can I close the ticket?

[felipemfp]

@mongkok, maybe is a good idea include this decorators in the package

[mongkok]

Hi @felipemfp,
decorators authenticate using any backend included in the AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS settings, I think it could be added in the Graphene Django framework, there is a related issue.

[mongkok]

Yes, you are quite right, I should include it in the README :)

@tutturen @felipemfp, in case it can help you, I developed a package with these decorators.
https://github.com/flavors/django-graphql-extensions

[mongkok]

Thanks @elwoodxblues,
there is a link to the [wiki] at the beginning, it might not be seen.

In my opinion, auth decorators are for general use, it can also be used for any backend included in the AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS, that's why I think it should be included in the graphene-django framework.

On the other hand I have my doubts, to include the decorators in this library would be of great help for all of us.

At the moment I reopen the issue.

[IdemenB]

Hi @mongkok, thanks a lot for making so many people's lives easier with your effort.

I'd like to have creation/verification/refreshing of tokens unprotected and all others that can be reached through the global schema protected. Can I ask what is the proper way of protecting the whole schema with the JWT using the lib? What I mean is, something not repeated rather than defininq @login_required for each Query and Mutation separately.

[abdulhafeez1724]

This is a helpful project, I just have one question, is there a way to protect mutations and queries from unauthorized uses?

Hi can you help me how to put token in header ?