Actual Number of Document Reads about firestore_helpers

[escamoteur]

Hi,
The location based queries either by using GetDataInArea or by creating a location constraints and use get data are executed on the server with one small caveat. It's only possible to query for locations inside a square that encompasses a circle with the desired radius. Which means the server will return also entries that are in the corners of the square but outside the radius. That entries are then filtered out on the client side.

[JCPradelPH]

Okay so lets say that I have 100 documents and then with my given radius there are only 30 documents inside the square encompassing my radius, will Firestore only charge me for 30 document reads?

[escamoteur]

All I can say that its a serverbased query and that only that data should be transmitted. You have to check the payment details yourself

[JCPradelPH]

Thanks for the quick response it is very much appreciated. We are aware of the pricing details, we were just asking how your library filter the results. Is it whether your querying all the documents inside the collection and loops through those documents to perform the filters needed or do you implement some kind of geohashing to avoid querying all the documents within the collection.

[escamoteur]

I thought I already wrote that above. I query all documents in a given geografical rectangle based on an greater / less than query on geopoints on the server side.

[JCPradelPH]

What we mean is are you performing the query like this:

const businesses = await firebaseAdmin.firestore().collection("businesses").get()
// perform logic for nearby location

or like this

const businesses = await firebaseAdmin.firestore().collection("businesses")
     .where("location", "==", geoLoc).get()

We just want to verify how are you fetching records from firestore because the first approach is pretty expensive in read operations.

Thanks in advance.

[escamoteur]

The second one which is meant if you say server side query. Also you can always look into the code

[JCPradelPH]

Great! Thanks for clearing that out. Cheers!