SACN problem in priority about espixelstick

[MartinMueller2003]

PixelStick does NOT support sACN priorities. It will send whatever data it receives and assumes only a single sACN source is sending data to it. This would be an enhancement request.

[iz1kbp]

Ok! I operate in this way! Thank's for the support! **********************************************************Mario Brustia - IZ1KBPLOC JN45IK - 45.4167N 8.6667E - QRZ Pilota SAPR ENAC A2 ITA-RP-000000609ABA / IT-STS-012008 OPERATORE ENAC:ITEAYYIFSKOPERATORE EASA:ITA3YNC64M41Y776R2SMPix4D certified user - QSC certified userP.IVA 02638890034 - Albo Artigiani N. ***@***.***@pec.itwww.meteotrecate.it  www.aprtrecate.itFacebook >> brustiamariosent from webmail********************************************************** Da: "Martin Mueller" ***@***.*** A: "forkineye/ESPixelStick" ***@***.*** Cc: "Mario" ***@***.***,"Author" ***@***.*** Data: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 08:35:12 -0700 Oggetto: Re: [forkineye/ESPixelStick] SACN problem in priority (Issue #758) PixelStick does NOT support sACN priorities. It will send whatever data it receives and assumes only a single sACN source is sending data to it. This would be an enhancement request. —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[MartinMueller2003]

This is just a note for a future implementer of this feature. It gives a nice description of how a product handles priority data. The one thing it does not mention is timing out a source. How long do you wait before moving to a lower priority data source.
https://support.etcconnect.com/ETC/Networking/General/Difference_between_sACN_per-address_and_per-port_priority

[iz1kbp]

...on time out, in fact I have never read any data. Personally I use universe priority. I also tried channel priority but it is only implemented by some receivers and some "standard"received read this "gap" like a empty frame. Etc, in fact,  recommended not to use it in systems that do not implement the channel code.Priority  is certainly a useful option since it is essentially a much simpler backup than artnet. the intervention times? in my opinion two frames...like priority channel (1 frame)Have a nice Easter!Mario **********************************************************Mario Brustia - IZ1KBPLOC JN45IK - 45.4167N 8.6667E - QRZ Pilota SAPR ENAC A2 ITA-RP-000000609ABA / IT-STS-012008 OPERATORE ENAC:ITEAYYIFSKOPERATORE EASA:ITA3YNC64M41Y776R2SMPix4D certified user - QSC certified userP.IVA 02638890034 - Albo Artigiani N. ***@***.***@pec.itwww.meteotrecate.it  www.aprtrecate.itFacebook >> brustiamariosent from webmail********************************************************** Da: "Martin Mueller" ***@***.*** A: "forkineye/ESPixelStick" ***@***.*** Cc: "Mario" ***@***.***,"Author" ***@***.*** Data: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 08:48:47 -0700 Oggetto: Re: [forkineye/ESPixelStick] SACN problem in priority (Issue #758) This is just a note for a future implementer of this feature. It gives a nice description of how a product handles priority data. The one thing it does not mention is timing out a source. How long do you wait before moving to a lower priority data source. https://support.etcconnect.com/ETC/Networking/General/Difference_between_sACN_per-address_and_per-port_priority —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>