Comments (14)
Yeah I wasted alot of time on this just trying to fix all the code that was broken. Thanks for the tip, will try pesto.
from dmasif.
@orange2350, on top of that, the output of dmasif --search is embeddings, not a probability of binding like with --site, so you still need to figure out how to use those embeddings. If you have the time, skill and really want dmasif over masif or newer ones, expect 2 weeks to 2 months to sort out all the problems, and then you'll probably would like to retrain the network with a better dataset (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-023-02409-3).
Don't take it as a discouragement, not at all, but I think it's a realistic assessment of the state of the github.
from dmasif.
@wjs20, did you get any further, by any chance?
from dmasif.
Unfortunately not.. did you have a stab at it?
from dmasif.
@wjs20, a full broadsword thrust... Had to correct probably all the modules, eg the boolean arguments in Arguments.py, that are wrongly coded -very fun to ask for True and get a False-, realised that it was not only hard-coded, but that the code failed with new training data, and after a long while and lots of edits for the memory leak -that in the end could not fix, but is in the training loop-, I trained the model with the DIPS-plus dataset and got above 0.8 auroc. If you are after finding the PPI surface give pesto a go (https://pesto.epfl.ch/). The website will take you to the paper, and the paper to the github. The github requires work to figure out, but nowhere as much as dmasif.
from dmasif.
@rubenalv Hi, may I ask where you are saying there is a problem? I can run dmasif_search, but the mean auroc value of the prediction result is only about 0.55, have you found out what's wrong, thanks you very much
from dmasif.
from dmasif.
@rubenalv Thank you very much for your reply. I went and checked the Arguements file, I reran the main_training and the inference PY file, printed the args and it shows that search is True. but I found the error during the run, it saves the prediction during the inference process after the prediction inputs, when saving the file, it saves the prediction results as predction = P['iface_preds']..... , but obviously the key 'iface_preds' is not generated by feeding dMaSIF for inference when search is True, so I think there might be a problem here, but still looking into it. I would be honored if you have time to communicate, my email is [email protected]. All the best!
from dmasif.
@wjs20 hi,have you let the ROC-AUC higher? thank you
from dmasif.
Hi orange2350. I havn't touched this repo in over a year. The code is full of bugs and very poorly written, I wouldn't trust any results that come out. The author seems to have abandoned it. I would give up on it if I were you. As @rubenalv said, Masif looks to me like it is better maintained. They are your best bet I think.
from dmasif.
@wjs20 Hi,wjs20,thank you for your reply:)
from dmasif.
@rubenalv hi,my work may be better carried out with dmasif, so I am prepared to spend a long time, thank you! And the data set you recommend! You may have forgotten, but you have helped me before with the dataset you recommended.anyway,your reply makes me feel very warm on the difficult road of scientific research and exploration. have a nice day!!:)
from dmasif.
@orange2350, have you made any progress that you could share, by any chance? I am stuck at the point that I have the protein embeddings for protein pairs, but do not know how to implement the MLP (or something more updated) they suggest they use in the paper for assessing the interaction...
from dmasif.
Related Issues (20)
- How to predict the interface characters of single protein? HOT 1
- dMaSIF for interaction prediction, how to find complementary regions? HOT 2
- No save model checkpoints for site prediction HOT 2
- Input seems to require a y value HOT 2
- Using main_training.py
- Problems regarding loss function and auroc
- Does anyone have a docker image that can run this project? Can you share it with me? HOT 4
- How to replace with my own dataset
- why the interface is computed like this ? HOT 4
- About helper.py
- Pre-trained model in Hugging face
- [Question] Are ligands or PTMs considered
- How to mathematically define the binding surface? HOT 1
- Why "iface_preds " contain NAN when training dmasif_ HOT 7
- Return value in diagonal_ranges function
- embedding example HOT 1
- faces of the protein surface
- RuntimeError: operation does not have an identity.
- TypeError: argument of type 'method' is not iterable HOT 2
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from dmasif.