Fix linting error about gitea

[tboerger]

On the other side, we will drop the bindata from the repo soon, than it's not part of the repo anymore

[DblK]

Do you would like to have a huge PR or smaller PR by folder for example?
I saw on lint it misses several comments for each function.

Tell me what you want.

[xinity]

@DblK smaller PR are easier to review :)

so i'd vote for smaller ones

[tboerger]

👍 for smaller prs, as @xinity said it's better to review

[tboerger]

But continue with the models, I already started parts within the makefile pr

[lunny]

Only modules/bindata/bindata.go not be fixed. But that file is generated by go-bindata. Any idea? @tboerger

[tboerger]

Switch to a proper bindata tool like fileb0x (but it doesn't support tags) or go.rice or somehow ignore it

[lunny]

But maybe we can ingore the golint check on Makefile at first. So that we an close this issue and ask all the PR to pass the golint.

[tboerger]

Maybe you can filter out the bindata package from the list temporary? Like grep -v

[strk]

@lunny if you find out how to ignore a single file, I'm all for going with it, especially as after a "make" invocation you'd have the bindata.go around and it might be annoying to get those false positives

[tboerger]

On the short term we can simply ignore the entire code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/bindata package.

[lunny]

So this could be closed via #303