Enable versioning for gcp_scanner about gcp_scanner

[ArkaprabhaChakraborty]

I want to take this up :)

[SaxenaAnushka102]

Hi @mshudrak!! Could you please elaborate a bit more about what type of versioning schema is expected (like branch-based or tag based or some other type)? I'd like to contribute, please could you assign the issue to me?

[ZhengLin-Li]

Hi @mshudrak I am wondering if we could use the Github release to do this?

[HarshitAgarwal22000]

Hey @mshudrak, would love to work on this and suggest possible solutions which can help us in this specific issue :)

[mshudrak]

Hey folks, thanks for interest. We have multiple people want to work on this issue. Please go ahead and work on it if you want. Github release sounds good for me. PTAL at https://github.com/DynamoRIO/dynamorio/ versioning as an inspiration.

[sriharshitha07]

Hello, @mshudrak!! Could you perhaps specify on the kind of versioning schema required ,like tag or branch based?  I'd would really like to partake; could you please allocate the issue to me?

[mshudrak]

Hi @sriharshitha07, we are looking for tag based schema. There is ongoing PR on this one, if you want you can help @ZhengLin-Li on that. We just don't want any third-party depencendcy.

[sriharshitha07]

Hi @sriharshitha07, we are looking for tag based schema. There is ongoing PR on this one, if you want you can help @ZhengLin-Li on that. We just don't want any third-party depencendcy.

alright ..thankyou

[sumit-158]

Hi, @mshudrak What about using release-please-action, It's good I have used it here? What your thoughts on this?

[mshudrak]

Yep, @sumit-158 this is the project that we can use for release actions.

[sumit-158]

@mshudrak Is anyone working on this Pr ?

[mshudrak]

There are two ongoing PRs but both of them are using third-party projects that I would prefer to avoid linking the scanner with.

[sumit-158]

@mshudrak Open the third Pr :-)

[mshudrak]

Ok, right now we have five PR requests related to this issue #34, #35, #98, #100, #102. Please take a look at previous PRs before considering submitting a new PRs to this one.

[mshudrak]

TL;DR: We do not want to use any non-maintained or untrusted third-party Github actions as I commented on #34, #35, #98, #102. We will proceed forward with Github Actions plugin offered in #100.

[anantyadav0]

This project is similar to my course curriculum, if this project is given to me then i surely give my best. And this project will helpful for my proffesional future.

[mshudrak]

It is done. We will rely on Github Actions to make releases. We will do them manually once a large set of features are implemented. PyPI workflow will be triggered automatically on new release.