println is redirected to stderr about subcommands

[xylo04]

Worth noting, using fmt.Println() is a workaround, but doesn't help if the subcommand is calling another library that uses println.

[slewiskelly]

I would consider using fmt.Println(...) to be the correct use, as opposed to a workaround.

This package does not use the println function directly, and this package cannot, and should not, control where output of a subcommand is being directed.

The println function always directs to stderr, and am not sure that it is intended for use in production code.

Also note that the language spec, suggests that implementations may change or even be removed entirely.