Generators can't be used to define an iterator about traceur-compiler

[arv]

From [email protected] on April 22, 2011 19:21:23
Python solves this problem differently. Their "for each" can accept objects with iter or next. Generators create via "yield" are always IEnumerators--they can't be reset, if you want that, you call the function again. This makes yield work correctly for defining iter in a class.

[arv]

From [email protected] on October 22, 2011 23:14:49
Our generators/iterators seem wrong to me.

The Harmony generators and iterators follows Python too.

In Traceur, calling a generator function returns an object that has traceurIterator and not an object with current/moveNext. The Harmony proposal, http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generators, returns an object with a next method.

I suggest we just go along the Harmony route here.

[arv]

From [email protected] on November 29, 2011 23:35:56
http://code.google.com/p/traceur-compiler/source/detail?r=356