Actions from Mar 24 meeting about graphql-over-http

[benjie]

General concensus from Spec WG on the content-type is "don't bother getting it approved... yet". Just use it. You can tick that off, I'll be updating people at the next HTTP WG - see #78

[sjparsons]

I've used the following mission statement and shared with some leaders at GraphQL Foundation and asked about the process of legally migrating this into the GraphQL Foundation.

Provide a specification that allows GraphQL clients and servers with different implementations and technology stacks to interact freely over HTTP if both client and server are compliant

Will report what I hear back on that thread at the meeting on Tuesday, April 28.

[sjparsons]

I've drafted a PR that adds guidance around serialization format and content-type into the specification. This reflects some ideas that were surfaced in our last meeting and puts inserts into the spec our proposed content type, application/graphql+json.

#83