GithubHelp home page GithubHelp logo

Decide open-source license about stow HOT 9 CLOSED

graymeta avatar graymeta commented on August 28, 2024
Decide open-source license

from stow.

Comments (9)

sekchai2 avatar sekchai2 commented on August 28, 2024 1

I vote for GNU gpl3 because we want it to be known the contribution and to distribute as widely as possible (with enhancements).

from stow.

jasonhancock avatar jasonhancock commented on August 28, 2024 1

If you want wide distribution, then any of the GNU licenses are off the table.

My vote is MIT or Apache 2.0

from stow.

matryer avatar matryer commented on August 28, 2024 1

MIT is my favourite. Dead easy. No brainer for people.

On 20 Oct 2016, at 16:16, Jason Hancock [email protected] wrote:

If you want wide distribution, then any of the GNU licenses are off the table.

My vote is MIT or Apache 2.0


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #97 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGNG4QrJHVDCTQeePm2UN502sfzFGoxks5q14XjgaJpZM4KbKOG.

from stow.

johnmotz avatar johnmotz commented on August 28, 2024

SO we are between MIT and Apache... I would lean towards Apache and also have Steve on our legal side looking at it to weigh in as well...

Mat what is the downside of Apache?

from stow.

jasonhancock avatar jasonhancock commented on August 28, 2024

Both MIT and Apache are permissive licenses. The main difference is the Apache license includes an express grant of patent rights from contributors to users. If we were ever to patent anything relating to stow, that could be an important thing for stow users to have.

from stow.

piotrrojek avatar piotrrojek commented on August 28, 2024

@matryer do we have an agreement on the license yet?

from stow.

matryer avatar matryer commented on August 28, 2024

Let's get Steve from legal to agree Apache license.

from stow.

johnmotz avatar johnmotz commented on August 28, 2024

That was how I read it also, didn't see a downside.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 20, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Jason Hancock <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Both MIT and Apache are permissive licenses. The main difference is the Apache license includes an express grant of patent rights from contributors to users. If we were ever to patent anything relating to stow, that could be an important thing for stow users to have.

You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/97#issuecomment-255170323, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQWXFoDfXEPlCwNC6xzm7-pol3HsMWF9ks5q16KfgaJpZM4KbKOG.

from stow.

matryer avatar matryer commented on August 28, 2024

Closing assuming the Apache license is good.

from stow.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.