racket-base-requires behaves oddly with module+ requires about racket-mode

[greghendershott]

Thanks for the report!

Unfortunately, I can't reproduce that, so far. First I tried literally what you said:

#lang racket
(require racket/stxparam)
(module+ test (require rackunit))

And it did the following, which is correct since racket/stxparam isn't used:

#lang racket/base

(module+ test (require rackunit))

---

Next, trying to guess what your file was really, like, from the fact that it kept racket/stxparam as a require, I tried adding some actual usage of it:

#lang racket
(require racket/stxparam)
(module+ test (require rackunit))
(define-syntax-parameter foo #f)

and it did the following, which is correct:

#lang racket/base
(require (for-syntax racket/base)
         racket/stxparam)

(module+ test (require rackunit))
(define-syntax-parameter foo #f)

---

So... I'm not sure what to do. I believe you found a bug, I'm just stumped how to repro it so I can fix it. Do you have any idea what your and my examples are missing?

[florence]

This is bizarre. For some reason I cannot reproduce it either, even by resetting to my repo to just before it failed...

The full example was:

#lang racket
(provide <some-really-long-list)

(require racket/shared (prefix-in r: racket))
(require racket/stxparam)
(require (for-syntax syntax/parse))
(module+ test (require rackunit))

[greghendershott]

That's OK, mainly thanks for the exact full example. At least that will help me try some "random" things -- like having point in various locations or having some active region in effect, before running the command -- that might elicit the bug.

[greghendershott]

I'm working through open issues. I'm not sure what to do about this one, since neither of us can reproduce it.

I think I'm going to go ahead and close it, now. However of course please re-open it if you experience it again (even if you still don't have a clear recipe to repro it).