[Suggestion] An introduction to ATO about digitalgov.gov

[trevorbryant-cisa]

Bump

[afeijoo]

@trevorbryant-cisa Thank you for the bump. We're working with the author to address your feedback.

[afeijoo]

Thank you for taking the time to read and respond to Digital.gov resources.

This post is meant as a practical guide for Digital.gov's audience, folks who is not familiar with compliance or security practices. We focus on giving practical advice for digital use cases. As the article says, readers should talk early and often to the person or team that will be accessing the system to understand their agency's specific policies and practices.

We are also in the process of making a companion video and that will make some of the nuances that you brought up more clear.

[trevorbryant-cisa]

@afeijoo Thanks for the clarification! I'm curious who Digital.gov's audience is? Is a limited set of viewers, or a wide set of viewers? Is this blog article written for everyone, or those that want to do business with GSA or TTS?

When can we expect to have some corrections made to at least L42 and L82? These are factual incorrect and really should be updated for correction. We want to avoid confusion and the assumption that every digital experience for systems authorization is the same of each agency.

If these articles are intended to target a wide range of viewers outside of those who are interested in doing business with GSA or TTS, I'd be interested in working with your compliance or security practice folks on contributing to these series. How would I go about contributing?