Question about singleton scope in shared container about factory

[hmlongco]

Yep. That's a fairly specific bug in regard to singletons in SharedContainer being resolved across multiple container instances and multiple container classes. I'll look into it.

At this point in time defaultScope is container-based. Any resolution from a container uses that container's default scope.

Your best bet there is simply to mark the service with .singleton.

[IvanShah]

I tried add .singleton to service in SharedContainer but it still inits twice. Behaviour stayed the same.

[hmlongco]

As mentioned this is a bug.

The "Your best bet there is simply to mark the service with .singleton." is the answer to the second question you asked. Since "SharedContainer" is virtual, there's no associated defaultScope, so each definition would need to marked as singleton.

That approach, however, won't work until the bug is fixed for this specific use case.

[hmlongco]

It's not an official release yet, but you can pull the main branch and see if this corrects the problem.

[IvanShah]

Yes, it's helped, service init one time thank you