iCal4j Only supported RFC 2445? iCal4j not RFC 5545 support? about ical4j

[benfortuna]

Hi,

Rfc5545 is essentially a refresh of the rfc2445 specification. As such,
ical4j should support most of the rfc5545 specification, although I haven't
verified it against the entire specification.

If you happen to find something where ical4j doesn't conform to rfc5545 do
let me know by raising a new issue in github.

Regards,
Ben

Ps. I don't have a definitive list of differences between the two
specifications, but I suspect most changes are intended to remove ambiguity
and increase coherence of the specification, rather than any major breaking
changes.
On 16 Sep 2015 7:41 pm, "신동민" [email protected] wrote:

When I don't know RFC 5545, I'm using only iCal4j (implement RFC 2445)
but I find RFC 5545 and I wonder if ical4j supports RFC5545.

If iCal4j not support RFC 5545, What is difference between RFC2445 and
RFC5545?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#46.

[dongmin-shin]

Thank you Ben :)