'Verify All' option should skip '-skipped' problems about eulerpy

[iKevinY]

Hmm, what's the current behaviour of --verify-all? Reading through my documentation it seems like I accounted for this, but maybe I didn't (it's been a looong time since I've looked at EulerPy 😅).

[gdfelt]

Currently it reruns everything and if a '-skipped' problem passes it changes it back to normal.

…

On Sun, May 19, 2019, 5:50 AM Kevin Yap ***@***.***> wrote: Hmm, what's the current behaviour of --verify-all? Reading through my documentation it seems like I accounted for this, but maybe I didn't (it's been a *looong* time since I've looked at EulerPy 😅). — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#27?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIZFRLFX3OUIAULUWKS3L3PWEWGLA5CNFSM4HNWAPI2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVW7S2A#issuecomment-493746536>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIZFRJSCTMIXHUMNHYTAPDPWEWGLANCNFSM4HNWAPIQ> .

[iKevinY]

Hmm, yeah I agree the behaviour should be to skip a skipped problem, even if it's actually correct. I should have some bandwidth to fix this over the next week or so.

[iKevinY]

Sorry about the delay, this slipped my mind since I haven't hacked on EulerPy in a while. Thinking about it a bit harder, I think it actually makes sense for --verify-all to attempt to run everything, stripping the suffix on correct, skipped problems.

The use case I imagine is that users go through and skip a bunch of problems, and go back and solve some of the skipped ones; --verify-all gives them a quick way to go through and "unskip" them en masse.