Allow Frame struct initialization with u16 data about y4m

[Kagami]

The simplest way is to add from_u16 method which would create Frame from u16 planes.

A bit better method is to implement #11 and accept either u8 or u16 depending on the colorspace. But it would be impossible to create high bitdepth frame from u8 planes then (unless introducing something like from_u8).

Also I'm not entirely sure y4m should deal with concept of pixels. Because u8 vs u16 is about the pixel values, not the data stream. Any frame can be represented as a stream of u8.

What do you think?

[rzumer]

Handling pixel values instead of raw data does introduce some additional concerns. We can leave it as is and leave the user with the responsibility of providing the raw data in u8 format. On the other hand, converting from high bit depth u16 data to u8 in safe Rust seems to require a significant amount of boilerplate for a use case that should be fairly common, so there is a clear benefit in handling this conversion as part of y4m.

[Kagami]

for a use case that should be fairly common

Seems like it, accepting u16 planes might give better user experience in real world use-cases.

Would you like to implement from_u16 for Frame?

[rzumer]

Sure, I will give it a try.

The conversion could look like this:

planes.iter().map(|&plane| plane.iter()
        .flat_map(|&plane_value| vec![(plane_value >> 8) as u8, plane_value as u8])
        .collect()).collect();

Which results in a Vec<Vec<u8>>. Afterwards slicing the inner vectors for 3 planes should be enough, but due to the Frame structure containing a reference to frame data rather than owning that data, I have not been able to figure out a clean way to persist this processed data, as the borrow dies as the constructor returns. Changing plane data to a vector type would allow it to own the data, but I'm not sure that this is desirable.

[Kagami]

(Haven't seen github notifications for last post editings.)

I think we should unsafely represent u16 as u8 with from_raw_parts.

[rzumer]

OK, I was trying to avoid unsafe code but that should work, I will try it soon.