Don't check for [[Prototype]] equality about is-equal

[mjackson]

I guess the other way I could do this would be to iterate over objects in toEqual and compare their values. Similar to how we discussed handling Set and Map in mjackson/expect#93.

[ljharb]

imo a normal object and a null object aren't conceptually equal tho - one is an empty object, one is an empty dict.

[mjackson]

@ljharb That's fine. It's easy enough for me to get the kind of behavior that I want in expect by just wrapping is-equal to get the kind of loose equality I'm looking for.

[ljharb]

Sounds good.

Another way to determine equality would be to compare new Map(Object.entries(x)) for both x, once you're comparing Maps in an unordered fashion.