How could I use "memoptest" to do UPI stress and make the total percentage of UPI bandwidth up to 100% ? about pcm

[opcm]

memoptest is single threaded. A single thread can not consume the whole bandwidth capacity. Please try to run many memoptest processes in parallel to get close to 100% utilization.

[WisQTuser]

Hi Developers,
I try to run many memoptest process in parallel, but the result is the same as before. Total percentage of UPI bandwidth still can't get close to 100%. The bandwidth of streaming to memory will be divided equally. please refer the screenshot result as below.

[opcm]

Hi, could you please try to use many memoptest instances but with read-only traffic to drive the utilization up? This will be option "0" instead of "2".

It is also important to disable compiler optimizations with "-O0" option:

g++ -O0 -std=c++11 memoptest.cpp -o memoptest

[WisQTuser]

Hi Developers,
I follow your suggestions using many memoptest instances with read-only traffic and disable compiler optimizations. The total UPI bandwidth percentage is up to about 85% but still can't get to 100%. If I keep opening a new window to run memoptest with option "0", the reading memory bandwidth will drop down to 17XX MB/s as the below picture . Is there anything that I can do ? Please refer the picture of test result. Thanks.

[opcm]

Can you try to use a mix of read and write traffic? There is also a specialized tool that can trigger different traffic patterns: https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intelr-memory-latency-checker
Options are --bandwidth_matrix and -Wn, where n is the type of traffic

[WisQTuser]

Hi Developers,
I try to use Intel memory latency checker to trigger different traffic patterns, and use options --bandwidth_matrix -Wn, where n is 2. But the total UPI bandwidth percentage can't always stay in high performance. Once the Numa mode number appears, the UPI bandwidth percentage will rise to 5X%. After two seconds, the UPI bandwidth percentage will drop to a lower value(0%). How should I do to keep the UPI bandwidth on the highest percentage like the memptest?

[opcm]

could you please increase the test phase duration? I believe this is -t option

[WisQTuser]

Hi Developers,
I increase the test phase duration -t, but the result is the same. Still can't keep the UPI bandwidth on the highest percentage.

[WisQTuser]

Hi developers,
Should I try another methods or command that can trigger the UPI traffic to 100%?

[opcm]

the parameter value you have chosen is in seconds. According to the screen shot it still runs local memory test. Did it ever finish? Please choose a smaller value (e.g. 16 seconds (per matrix element))

[WisQTuser]

Hi developers,
I use a smaller value to run the test. But the situation is the same as before. Still can't trigger the UPI traffic to 100%. The stress test only run the specific matrix will trigger the bandwidth higher, maybe about 90%. The whole test will be finished in about five minutes. I want the stress can be keep the UPI bandwidth on 100% overnight or even longer.

[opcm]

I could get 96% utilization with these parameters:

--loaded_latency -omlc_2s_10c_ro-remote.cfg -d0 -t1000

with this config file (mlc_2s_10c_ro-remote.cfg)

0-9 R seq 300000 dram 1
28-37 R seq 300000 dram 0

I guess on your 10 core CPU you need to change it to

0-9 R seq 300000 dram 1
10-19 R seq 300000 dram 0

you can increase -t parameter as you want to run it longer

[WisQTuser]

Hi developers,
I follow your instruction to run the test, only get about 60% utilization.
Is there anything wrong with my command or config file?

[opcm]

could you please run mlc without parameters and post the mlc output here as text? (just want to see if you platform configuration is healthy)

[opcm]

/proc/cpuinfo is also interesting to check

[WisQTuser]

Hi Developers,
I post the mlc output and cpuinfo as text.
Please refer it,
Thanks.
output.txt
cpuinfo.txt

[opcm]

You have a very weird OS processor -> socket topology (round robin). I did not expect that. Here is a fixed configuration file:

0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18 R seq 300000 dram 1
1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19 R seq 300000 dram 0

[WisQTuser]

Hi Developers,
After I use the fixed configuration file, I could get about 90% utilization. May I ask what's the meaning about the configuration file and the command "--loaded_latency -omlc_2s_10c_ro-remote.cfg -d0 -t1000? Could I change some value that can get more utilization? Thanks for your support again.

[opcm]

the options and configuration file format are described the readme file in the mlc package. You might try other traffic types and/or random traversal patterns.

[WisQTuser]

Ok, I will check the readme file, Thanks. Another question about pcm.x is the bandwidth utilization shows 90%, UPI0 and UPI2 show 21G. There are two Intel Skylake CPUs on our server, and peak bandwidth is 10.4 GT/s * 2channels * 2Bytes/channel=41.6GB/s (peak), 20.8GB/s per channel. How could I get the 21G of 90% data number on pcm.x ?

[opcm]

the formula you are using gives a somewhat pessimistic estimation of Intel UPI max throughput. Intel UPI may achieve a better packing of data into packets. PCM uses a more optimistic estimation of max throughput assuming good data packing.

[WisQTuser]

So if now I have to test with the max throughout of Intel UPI, which standard can I refer to that I could judge the result is passed or failed? Now I can use the command to trigger the total UPI bandwidth to 93%, I just want to know if the 93% of UPI bandwidth reach the standard or not.

[opcm]

as far as I know there is no standard that defines the theoretical maximum. It is workload dependent.

[WisQTuser]

Thanks for your answer. So you means the percentage of UPI bandwidth can be up to 100% if increasing the workload, how can I increase the workload if I can change hardware configuration or another traffic types?

[WisQTuser]

Hi Developers,
You means the percentage of UPI bandwidth can be up to 100% if increasing the workload, how can I increase the workload if I can change hardware configuration or another traffic types?

[opcm]

I never managed to drive the utilization to 100%. I think a specific synthetic test is required but I don't know how to implement it.