janlelis / sugar_refinery

Tiny refinements for Ruby

Ruby Sugar Refinery

The Ruby Sugar Refinery is a collection of tiny refinements (declarative local core extensions) for Ruby.

Setup & usage

Add to Gemfile:

gem 'sugar_refinery', require: 'sugar_refinery/all'

Then add refinements to the current Ruby file or module:

using SugarRefinery::CamelSnake
using SugarRefinery::HashZip

"ClassName".to_snake # => "class_name"
Hash.zip [1,2,3], [4,5,6] # => {1=>4, 2=>5, 3=>6}

List of included refinements

Please see the documentation, the code or the specs!

The Sugar Refinery was Zucker before

This collection of core extensions used to be called zucker.

Missing former functionality? It might have been extracted into a separate micro gem:

• iterate | Control structure-like iteration
• instance_variables_from | Auto-assign instance variables
• egonil | Egocentric nil
• debugging | Print debugging helpers
• procstar | Beyond symbol2proc
• ruby_info | Misc information about the Ruby environment
• ruby_version | Smart Ruby version accessor
• ruby_engine | Smar Ruby engine accessor

J-_-L

Copyright (c) 2010-2016 Jan Lelis, released under the MIT license

sugar_refinery's Issues

Permissions broken in 12.1 gem

When you install zucker as part of your system ruby (i.e., as root), you can't read most files, as they are 0600.
(A few are 664, which is a security hole.)

A

chmod -R og+r,g-w .

fixes this. You should do this before doing an updated gem.

Wrong permissions in zucker-9

It looks like the zucker-9 gem doesn't have its permissions set right, and certain files fail to load (e.g. 'zucker/all.rb')

Building zucker gem?

Hi, I am trying to add an alias_methods to my fork of your gem.

I can't seem to be able to build the gem however. I always use Jeweler as my gem package manager and RSpec 2 for specs. I tried $ rake

$ rake
(in /Users/kristianconsult/Development/Languages/Ruby/Apps/Gems/_forks/zucker)
rake aborted!
uninitialized constant Object::Zucker
/Users/kristianconsult/Development/Languages/Ruby/Apps/Gems/_forks/zucker/Rakefile:23:in `block in '
(See full trace by running task with --trace)

Why isn't Zucker loaded I wonder!?

require 'lib/zucker' # version

I then tried require 'zucker' # version, but without luck :(

I am using ruby 1.9.2-rc2

Please help ;)

gem rdoc failing for zucker 8

I noticed while running "gem rdoc --all" that the rdoc process seemed to silently fail when trying to process zucker. All it showed was:

Installing ri documentation for zucker-8...
gem 2.5.8

I enabled debugging and verbose and rdoc appears to be complaining:

greg-mbp-wireless:Desktop greg$ gem rdoc -V --debug  zucker
Exception `NameError' at /Users/greg/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p0/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:164 - uninitialized constant Gem::Commands::RdocCommand
Exception `Gem::LoadError' at /Users/greg/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p0/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:762 - Could not find RubyGem rdoc (>= 0)

Exception `Errno::ENOENT' at /Users/greg/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p0/lib/ruby/1.9.1/fileutils.rb:1212 - No such file or directory - /Users/greg/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p0/doc/zucker-8/ri
Exception `Errno::ENOENT' at /Users/greg/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p0/lib/ruby/1.9.1/fileutils.rb:1212 - No such file or directory - /Users/greg/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p0/doc/zucker-8/ri
Exception `Errno::ENOENT' at /Users/greg/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p0/lib/ruby/1.9.1/fileutils.rb:1309 - No such file or directory - /Users/greg/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p0/doc/zucker-8/ri
Installing ri documentation for zucker-8...
rdoc --ri --op /Users/greg/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p0/doc/zucker-8/ri --version --quiet lib --title zucker-8 Documentation
gem 2.5.8

I jumped over to the zucker gem directory to nose around but haven't figured out what makes rdoc so mad so far. I did notice that it appears that there are a bunch of old directories hanging around in the distribution, at least they're old versions based on the directory layout. Is there any reason we have to have directories 1..8? I compared several of the files using vimdiff and they appear identical, so it looks like we're dragging around a bunch of old files we don't need.

So, do you have any idea why rdoc would be complaining, and is it OK to remove the 1..8 directories?

Thanks.