Use HTTP/2 and SPDY about lite-server

[Meligy]

Another +1 for this, especially as a development server.

When you load Angular2 via SystemJS, you have quite a large number of requests depending on your import tree.

This is not the production experience, but it kinda slows down the development experience (sample).

HTTP/2 might be a good solution for this development-only problem.

[goldibex]

Thanks all. Well, let me lay out my arguments for you here first -- if
they're totally unconvincing it may not be worth the effort.

1. lite-server is part of the "future, now" Javascript ecosystem. It's
   advertised for use developing with JSPM and Angular 2, for instance. HTTP/2
   is the future of communication on the Web, so it makes sense to get people
   developing on that now.
2. I have some very, very preliminary data showing that in development
   cases where hundreds of objects need to be loaded from the server (common
   enough with JSPM and even modestly sized projects these days), HTTP/2 can
   cut down time to first load for developers considerably.
3. It's a little-ish issue, but I think it's also important to get
   developers saying the mantra "SSL only," starting from their development
   instances. I've already developed a tool that de-complicates the process so
   you don't have to worry about bright red SSL warnings more than, say, once
   a month. It's true that you could do the same thing against HTTP/1.1 also,
   but packaging it with a move to HTTP/2 makes it easier for developers to
   swallow -- honey on the rim of the medicine cup, as it were.

If this is at least a colorable argument to you, let me know and I'll take
a pass at it.

All best
Harry

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:53 AM John Papa [email protected] wrote:

I agree with Chris, but curiosity has got me ... I'd like to see what you
have in mind just to satisfy that :)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#15 (comment)
.

[cgmartin]

As a simple development server I don't feel like this has much value. Is there a particular use-case for development that you have that requires HTTP/2?

Running lite-server in production is absolutely not recommended. :)

Another quirk is that this project is a simple wrapper around BrowserSync's server feature. If it can't do HTTP/2, then I assume we'd have large difficulty trying to work that in via lite-server. But if Browsersync ever does include that feature, it could be easily enabled through lite-server's overrides.

[johnpapa]

I agree with Chris, but curiosity has got me ... I'd like to see what you have in mind just to satisfy that :)

[jakeNiemiec]

+1

[j-perezr]

+1