[Question] Is the D9VK ready for testing? about d9vk

[ronoverdrive]

@Kerrung when you hear the frogs chirping uncontrollably in the swamp. ;P

[jp7677]

@Kerrung I'm certainly not in the position to answer for Joshua, though while your enthusiasm is appreciated, I would suggest to refrain yourself from opening (for now useless) issues until there is at least a tagged version of d9vk that is targeted for broader usage.

[Joshua-Ashton]

Soon

[Tk-Glitch]

As of right now it's still a bit too early. Also it will currently fail to build on Linux. Soon™

[Joshua-Ashton]

Closing this issue as I think the question has been answered.

[Kerrung]

@Tk-Glitch thank you!
And how can I find out about when it will be possible to try it?

[TedHartDavis]

Because it's in development, it's inherent that it'll improve with time. I would suggest waiting a while before sinking your time into it, but what Josh has shown me is very, very promising.

[TedHartDavis]

@Tk-Glitch thank you!
And how can I find out about when it will be possible to try it?

Just keep paying attention. Josh is busy and is doing this in his free time (:

[Kerrung]

Okay. I am very interested to test, whether D9VK will work faster than Gallium Nine Standalone?

[TedHartDavis]

Okay. I am very interested to test, whether D9VK will work faster than Gallium Nine Standalone?

It looks like you're asking questions about indeterminate thing that will change over time; you'd best try for yourself if you want to see.

[Ahmed-E-86]

It will be interesting to see SweetFX running with D9VK.

[TedHartDavis]

@Kerrung I'm certainly not in the position to answer for Joshua, though while your enthusiasm is appreciated, I would suggest to refrain yourself from opening (for now useless) issues until there is at least a tagged version of v9dk that is targeted for broader usage.

Useless? Wasteful, I'd say