Pacback unable to find dhclient package (due to funky version string?) about pacback

[JustinTimperio]

Hi @Humandoodlebug,

I was wondering how long it would take for something like this to break. This has to do with the way the search works for the package versions, as a system contains multiple cached versions typically. There is a spec that all packages are meant to follow and this naming convention falls outside that I believe. I have dealt with this on AUR packages but never one in the standard repos.

I'll look into fixing this but I can't promise that it will get done quickly as i think this is a pretty rare naming edge case.

[Humandoodlebug]

Thanks @JustinTimperio, no rush! I'd poke the package maintainer, but by the looks of it they're deriving the version from upstream so might be reluctant to change it.